චන්ද්රිකා විජයව බැන්දත් විජයට ඒ හයි සොසයිටි එකේ මූව් වෙන්න බැරි උනා. විජය ගේ පීඩිත දේශපාලනයත් ඒකේ කොටසක්. චන්ඳ්රිකාට තරහා ගියාම විජයට කුලය පන්තිය ඇදලා බැන්නේ. විජයගේ පුතා මේ පහල ක්ලාස් එක අතික්රමණය කරලා දැන් ඉහල සමාජයත් එක්ක මූව් වෙන්න පුලුවන්. ඒත් පීඩිත සමාජයට ඔහු අමුත්තෙක් ඒ වගේම විජයගේ පුතා විමුක්ති සමරිසියෙක් බව ඔහු පිලිබඳව දන්න කෙනෙක් කිව්වා. ඒක සත්යක්ද දන්නේ නෑ. විමුක්ති සමරිසියෙක් නම් පසුගාමී ලාංකික සමාජය ඔහුව කොහොම පිලිගනීද කියන එක ගැටලුවක්. නමුත් හරිනී වගේ චරිතයක් ශ්රී ලංකාවේ මධ්යම පාන්තිකයෝ පිලිගත්තා. ඒ කියන්නේ විමුක්තිට ලොකු බාධාවක් නෑ.. ශ්රී ලංකා දේශපාලනයේ තිබෙන සැහැසි - ක්ෂිතිමය දේවල් විමුක්ති කුඩා කාලයේ සිට අත් දුටුවා. ඒ නිසා ඔහු ශ්රී ලංකා දේශපාලනයට ස්ව කැමැත්තෙන් අවතීර්ණ වෙයිද කියා සැකයි. විජයට එතරම් උගත් කමක් විභවයක් තිබ්බේ නෑ. තිබ්බේ ජනප්රියතාව විතරයි. විජයගේ මරණය නිසා ඔහු වීර දේශපාලන චරිතයක් උනා. නමුත් බලය ලැබුනා නම් විජය මෝඩ දේශපාලකයන් ගේ ගොඩට වැටිලා මේ වෙන කොට වාසුලා වගේ අවලංගු චරිතයක් . නමුත් විමුක්ති එන්නේ උසස් අධ්යාපනයක් එක්ක. විජයගේ අඩුපාඩු ඔහු තුල නෑ. විමුක්ති වගේ සෙකන්ඬ් ජෙනරේශන් ප්රභූ මොඩ්ල් එකකට ලංකාවේ ජනයා කැමතියි. වර්තමාන නිර් ප්රභූ සහ වෙන්ඩ ප්රභූ මාලිමා - ජවිපෙ දේශපාලකයන් ගේ විපරීත නිසා තව වසර දෙක තුනකින් හොඳ ඇක්සන්ට් එකකින් ලස්සනට ඉංග්රීසි කතා කරන බටහිර සංස්කෘතියට බටහිර සංවර්ධිත සහ විනයක් තිබෙන ලෝකයකට එක්ස්පෝස් වෙච්ච චරිතයකට ලොකු ඩිමාන්ඬ් එකක් එනවා. ඒක විමුක්තිගේ චාන්ස් එක. නමුත් පසුගාමී චින්තනයක් තියන ලංකාවේ මිනිසුන් එක්ක විමුක්ති තියා ලී ක්වාන් යූ ආවත් ලොකු සමාජ වෙනසක් නම් සිදු වෙන එකක් නෑ. ඒක කටුක යථාර්ථයක්.
Sunday, December 28, 2025
Thursday, December 25, 2025
අපගේ ගංජා පත්රිකාව
ගංජා භාවිතය සහ සෞඛ්ය පිලිබඳ ආචාර්ය මන්ඩේ ඉග්වේ (නයිජීරියාව) , විශේෂඥ මනෝ වෛද්ය උපාලි පීරිස් සහ මා විසින් ලියන ලද පත්රිකාව.
Cannabis Use and Mental Health
Dr. Monday N. Igwe, Dr. Upali P. K. Peris, and Dr. Ruwan M. Jayatunge
Cannabis sativa (marijuana) has been used throughout the world medically, recreationally, and spiritually for thousands of years (Maule, 2015). It is the most commonly used illicit drug in the world (Wittchen et al., 2009). Despite being illegal in many countries, it is easily obtained and even homegrown (Delisi et al., 2006). According to the results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, the rate of marijuana use has had a steady increase since 2007. Cannabis use continues to constitute a social and public health problem.
The cannabis plant (Cannabis sativa) has a long history of use both as a medicinal agent and intoxicant (ElSohly & Slade, 2005). There are over 400 chemicals in marijuana. Active compounds of cannabis, called cannabidiols, have 64 active isomers. Only one metabolite, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), is reported to be an active metabolite responsible for its effects (Morrison et al., 2009). THC usually refers to the naturally existing isomer of delta-9-THC but also may include delta-8-THC. The delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol contains psychoactive properties. Marijuana produces a number of characteristic behaviors in humans and animals, including memory impairment, antinociception, and locomotor and psychoactive effects (Sim-Selley, 2003).
THC leads to increased activation in frontal and paralimbic regions and the cerebellum (Chang & Chronicle, 2007). Cannabinoids act on a specific receptor that is widely distributed in the brain regions involved in cognition, memory, reward, pain perception, and motor coordination (Adams & Martin, 1996). Cannabis produces euphoria and relaxation, perceptual alterations, time distortion, and the intensification of ordinary sensory experiences (Hall, Solowij & Lemon 1994).
Although most people who smoke cannabis will develop neither severe mental health problems nor dependence, regular use of cannabis may be associated with a range of health, emotional, behavioral, social, and legal problems, particularly in young, pregnant, and severely mentally ill people (Winstock, Ford & Witton, 2010). Cannabis users who also smoke tobacco are more dependent on cannabis, have more psychosocial problems, and have poorer cessation outcomes than those who use cannabis but not tobacco (Peters, Budney & Carroll 2012).
Epidemiological studies indicate that approximately 10% of lifetime cannabis users meet the criteria for cannabis abuse or dependence (Anthony et al., 1994; Cottler et al., 1995; Hall et al., 1999). The epidemiological literature shows that cannabis use increases the risk of accidents (Hall, 2015) and the risk of motor vehicle crashes (Hall & Degenhardt, 2009). Cannabis is currently one of the leading substances reported in arrests (Dennis et al., 2002).
Tolerance and dependence on cannabinoids develop after chronic use, as demonstrated both clinically and in animal models (Sim-Selley, 2003). According to Levin and colleagues (2011), cannabis dependence is a substantial public health problem. A large body of evidence now demonstrates that cannabis dependence, both behavioral and physical, does occur in about 7-10% of regular users, and that early onset of use, and especially of weekly or daily use, is a strong predictor of future dependence (Kalant, 2004). Cannabis dependence, or cannabis use disorder, is defined in the fifth revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) as a condition requiring treatment (Gordon, Conley & Gordon, 2013).
Cannabis withdrawal is an important component of cannabis dependence (Lee et al., 2014). As many as 85% of users experience withdrawal (Budney et al., 2004; Winstock et al., 2010). Cannabis withdrawal is characterized by craving, irritability, nervousness, depressed mood, restlessness, sleep difficulty, and anger. With the recent publication of the DSM-5, a cannabis withdrawal syndrome is now officially recognized with defined criteria (APA, 2013).
Consequences of Cannabis Use
Studies show significant negative effects of smoking marijuana on physical and mental health as well as social and occupational functioning (Gazdek, 2014). Smoking marijuana is known to have hemodynamic consequences (Mittleman et al., 2001). Cannabis also has immunosuppressant and endocrine effects, although the clinical significance of these is still not clear (Ashton, 2001). Cannabis smoking shows a dose-response relation with pulmonary risk in the same way that tobacco smoking does. Although problems of cannabis use can arise at any level of use, however low, cannabis use disorders and other problems are more likely to arise in long-term, heavy daily users than in casual, infrequent users. (Winstock et al., 2010).
Longitudinal association between cannabis use and mental health has been studied by the researchers. Cannabis use is a known risk factor for a range of mental health problems (van Gastel et al., 2014). Cannabis use has been associated with several adverse life outcomes, including unemployment, legal problems, dependence, and early school leaving (Serafini et al., 2013). Furthermore, Monshouwer and colleagues (2006) specify that cannabis use is associated with aggression and delinquency. In addition, Fergusson and Boden (2008) point out that greater welfare dependence and lower relationship and life satisfaction are associated with cannabis abuse.
The majority of studies have suggested a significant cognitive decline in cannabis abusers compared to non-abusers and healthy controls (Shrivastava et al., 2011; Solowij, 1988). According to Kalant (2004), cannabis use has been linked to a number of both short- and long-term health consequences, including depression, paranoia, learning problems, and memory and attention deficits. In addition, cannabis use also causes symptoms of depersonalization, fear of dying, and irrational panic ideas (Khan & Akella 2009). Also, cannabis use significantly increases the risk for manic symptoms (Henquet, Krabbendam & Graaf, 2006) and mania (Leweke & Koethe, 2008). Evidence indicates that cannabis use is considerably associated with both attempted and completed suicides among healthy youths (Serafini et al., 2013; Price et al., 2009).
Cannabis intoxication can occur shortly after cannabis use. The intoxication by cannabis is associated with subjective symptoms of euphoria, perceptual distortion, continuous giggling, sedation, lethargy, impaired perception of time, difficulties in the performance of complex mental processes, impaired judgment, and social withdrawal (Crippa et al. 2012). Some clinicians have noticed panic attacks with cannabis intoxication. Cannabis intoxication symptoms are usually gone after a maximum of one week of abstinence (Lishman, 1988).
Heavy cannabis use could lead to an ‘amotivational syndrome,’ which has been described as personality deterioration with loss of energy and drive to work (Tennant & Groesbeck, 1972; Johns, 2001). Cannabis-induced amotivational syndrome negatively impacts volition, self-care, and social performance.
Cannabis-induced psychotic disorder (CIPD) refers to psychotic symptoms that arise in the context of cannabis intoxication (Morales-Muñoz et al., 2014). Cannabis use is a risk factor for the development of incident psychotic symptoms (Arendt et al., 2005; Kuepper et al., 2011) and exacerbates psychosis (Hall et al., 2004). Hall and team (2004) state that cannabis use can precipitate schizophrenia in vulnerable individuals. Deficits in prepulse inhibition (PPI) and cannabis abuse are consistently found in schizophrenia (Morales-Muñoz et al., 2015).
Cannabis use in adolescence leads to a two- to three-fold increase in relative risk for schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder in adulthood (Arseneault et al., 2004). The abuse of cannabis by patients with psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and mood and anxiety disorders has a negative impact both in the acute and advanced stages of these conditions (Diehl, Cordeiro, & Laranjeira, 2010).
Exposure to marijuana during a critical period of neural development may interrupt maturational processes (Jacobus et al., 2009). Adolescents appear more adversely affected by heavy use than adults (Schweinsburg, Brown & Tapert, 2008). Chronic cannabis use may alter brain structure and function in adult and adolescent populations (Batalla et al., 2013). Sami and colleagues (2015) suspect cannabis use may be associated with dopamine signaling alterations. Fontes and team (2011) point out that cannabis use has been associated with prefrontal cortex (PFC) dysfunction.
Arseneault and colleagues (2004) were of the view that cases of psychotic disorder could be prevented by discouraging cannabis use among vulnerable youths. Consequently, Moore and team (2007) emphasize that there is sufficient evidence to warn young people that using cannabis could increase their risk of developing a psychotic illness later in life.
According to El Marroun and team (2009), maternal cannabis use, even for a short period, may be associated with several adverse fetal growth trajectories. Cannabinoids have the ability to cross the placental barrier to the fetus and are detectable in the breast milk of mothers who use cannabis (Liebke, 2001). Current evidence indicates that cannabis use during both pregnancy and lactation may adversely affect neurodevelopment, especially during periods of critical brain growth both in the developing fetal brain and during adolescent maturation, with impacts on neuropsychiatric, behavioral, and executive functioning. (Jaques et al., 2014). Prenatal marijuana exposure is associated with adverse perinatal effects (Astley & Little, 1990).
Medical Uses of Cannabis
The use of cannabis for medical purposes is a controversial but important topic of public and scientific interest (Ware, Adams & Guy, 2005). According to Grotenhermen and Müller-Vahl (2012), cannabinoids are useful for the treatment of various medical conditions. Medicinal marijuana has been prescribed in chronic pain management, antiepileptic treatment in partial epilepsy, and symptomatic relief in multiple sclerosis and chronic neuropathic pain. However, severe risks are associated with the non-medicinal use of cannabis. Hill (2015) emphasizes that physicians should educate patients about medical uses of marijuana to ensure that it is used appropriately and that patients will benefit from its use.
Although cannabis has valid medical applications, it has addictive potential. Heavy cannabis use may contribute to the development of significant psychosocial and health-related problems (Budney, Vandrey, and Stanger 2010). Cannabis use clearly has serious implications for young people who are particularly sensitive to its psychotogenic effects (Kolliakou et al., 2012). Early interventions are essential in treating cannabis-related disorders.
Management of Cannabis Use
The prevalence of marijuana abuse and dependence disorders has been increasing among adults and adolescents. They continue to smoke the drug despite social, psychological, and physical impairments, commonly citing consequences such as relationship and family problems, guilt associated with use of the drug, financial difficulties, low energy and self-esteem, dissatisfaction with productivity levels, sleep and memory problems, and low life satisfaction (Gruber et al., 2003; Budney et al., 2007).
Despite the fact that there are large numbers of people with cannabis dependence, relatively little attention has been paid to the treatment of this condition (Nordstrom & Levin, 2007), and also the preventative strategies are still limited (Deogan et al., 2015).
Pharmacological and psychological interventions are recommended for the cannabis use disorder. Allsop and team (2014) propose cannabis extract nabiximols (Sativex) as a medication for cannabis withdrawal. Levin and colleagues (2011) suggest dronabinol for the treatment of cannabis dependence. Haney et al. (2013) recommend the FDA-approved synthetic analogue of THC nabilone, which has higher bioavailability and clearer dose-linearity than dronabinol.
Steinberg and team (2002) suggest psychosocial treatment for cannabis dependence. Among the psychological interventions, cognitive and behavioral therapies and motivational enhancement therapies have proven to be effective in cannabis withdrawal and dependence (Benyamina et al., 2008).
Motivational enhancement therapy is designed to help resolve ambivalence about quitting and strengthen motivation to change (Elkashef et al., 2008). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has demonstrated efficacy as both a monotherapy and as part of combination treatment strategies (McHugh, Hearon & Otto, 2010).
CBT for marijuana dependence has typically been delivered in 45- to 60-minute individual or group counseling sessions. The overall focus is the teaching of coping skills relevant to quitting marijuana and coping with other related problems that might interfere with a good outcome. Such coping skills include functional analysis of marijuana use and cravings, development of self-management plans to avoid or cope with drug-use triggers, drug refusal skills, problem-solving skills, and lifestyle management (Elkashef et al., 2008). In addition, Litt and team (2008) highlight the efficacy of contingency management treatments for marijuana dependence.
Treatment of cannabis use among people with psychotic or depressive disorders is imperative. Available studies indicate that effectively treating the mental health disorder with standard pharmacotherapy may be associated with a reduction in cannabis use and that longer or more intensive psychological intervention rather than brief interventions may be required, particularly among heavier users of cannabis and those with more chronic mental disorders (Baker, Hides & Lubman 2010).
As a safer alternative, some propose cannabis substitution, which is a method of harm reduction. Harm reduction refers to policies and programs that aim to reduce the harms associated with the use of drugs. Cannabis substitution can be an effective harm reduction method for those who are unable or unwilling to stop using drugs completely (Lau et al., 2015). Based on principles of public health, harm reduction offers a pragmatic yet compassionate set of strategies designed to reduce the harmful consequences of addictive behavior for both drug consumers and the communities in which they live (Marlatt, 1996).
Conclusion
Cannabis abuse can have a profound effect on the health of individuals, their families, and their communities. Prevention and intervention programs for marijuana abuse are highly essential. Early intervention initiatives and psychoeducation strategies are important in preventive actions.
Unpacking Friedrich Nietzsche
Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge
Friedrich Nietzsche is considered an existential philosopher primarily because he shifted the focus of philosophy from abstract metaphysics to the lived experience of the individual and the urgent problem of finding meaning in an indifferent universe. He is a radical philosopher because he sought to systematically dismantle the most fundamental pillars of Western civilization—including its religion, morality, and concepts of truth.
Nietzsche asserted that facts do not exist independently; rather, they are shaped by interpretations -(Nietzsche stated that there are no facts, only interpretations). He proposed a cultural philosophy that stands in contrast to the concept of nature, arguing that human beings lack inherent values. In his view, humans are akin to predatory animals, and he dismissed the notion that suffering holds any intrinsic value or meaning. For Nietzsche, strength represented the highest virtue, and he expressed admiration for figures like Wagner, celebrated ideals of masculinity, and explored the concept of the "will to power."
Nietzsche's approach to philosophy was marked by a provocative and destructive style, often described as "philosophizing with a hammer." His writings contain elements of racism, antisemitism, cruelty, and misogyny, yet his influence on Western thought remains undeniable. There are no universally accepted interpretations of his work; instead, it is characterized by contradictory and paradoxical ideas that challenge conventional understanding.
In many ways, Friedrich Nietzsche can be accurately described as a poet-philosopher. He used artistic, musical, and metaphorical language. Nietzsche used oxymorons and paradoxes intentionally to mirror his belief that reality is not a fixed, logical system, but a fluid and contradictory process of "becoming". Nietzsche wanted to "be understood by being misunderstood.
Friedrich Nietzsche did serve as a medical orderly during the Franco-Prussian War (1870–1871) and witnessed traumatic events; there is no clinical evidence that he suffered from "war neurosis." However, the war trauma transformed him, and his later focus on Power was not a glorification of military dominance but a psychological reaction to the weakness he witnessed in both the victims and the victors of war.
Power is central to Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy because he viewed the "Will to Power" as the fundamental driving force of all existence. It is a metaphysical and psychological description of life itself. He believed that life is not merely a struggle for survival but a proactive effort to grow, expand, and discharge strength. For Nietzsche, the highest form of power was internally directed rather than the political domination of others.
Nietzsche was born into a devout family, and his initial affection for Christianity was profound. However, the premature deaths of his father and brother prompted him to adopt a more critical perspective on the faith. This psychological upheaval catalyzed his transformation into what he later termed an anti-Christ. In subsequent years, he emerged as a formidable critic of Christianity and metaphysics alike, embracing the title "anti-Christ" as a badge of honor.
Friedrich Nietzsche's proclamation that "God is dead" remains one of the most significant yet frequently misinterpreted statements in Western philosophy. By the statement "God is dead," Nietzsche meant that the cultural and psychological authority of the Christian God had become "unbelievable" and obsolete in the modern era. He argued that God—the traditional anchor for absolute truth, morality, and purpose—had lost its power to command the modern mind. It's the loss of metaphysical authority over humans.
Nietzsche contended that Christianity represented a religion of subjugation, particularly for the Jews during the Roman Empire, who found themselves powerless against their oppressors. In response to their suffering, Christianity offered the promise of an afterlife filled with joy and liberation. However, Nietzsche criticized this notion as a deceptive form of consolation that ultimately hindered individuals from confronting and transforming their present hardships. He believed that such a false hope for a better existence beyond death discouraged meaningful action to alleviate their current struggles.
Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of herd morality is defined as a collective value system based on common social norms, societal standards, and the desire for conformity. Nietzsche viewed traditional morality not as a set of helpful rules, but as a "danger of dangers"—a systematic impediment that stifles human excellence and prevents the emergence of the "higher type" of human being. Nietzsche argued that people stick to "herd morality" not because it is true or right, but because it provides vital psychological and survival benefits for the "weak" majority. Nietzsche posited that humanity exists within the realm of nature rather than under the influence of a divine or celestial order.
Friedrich Nietzsche believed humans were blind to natural selection, not divine selection, and were destined for extinction. Nietzsche’s view is that all religious and divine values are human constructs. Moral laws are human creations that have no transcendent value.
Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy is called life-affirming because its ultimate goal is to move beyond the despair of meaninglessness (nihilism) and "say yes" to life exactly as it is—including its suffering, chaos, and cruelty.
Nietzsche categorized nihilism into three distinct types: passive, active, and complete. The passive nihilist acknowledges the demise of traditional values, such as God and objective morality, yet responds with a sense of weary resignation to the apparent void of meaning in life. In contrast, the active nihilist reacts with anger and resentment, aggressively dismantling outdated beliefs but ultimately fails to establish new values. The complete nihilist, on the other hand, fully comprehends that the highest values, including God, universal morality, and objective truth, have lost their significance.
Nietzsche's overman is a radical psychological and creative transformation. The overman transcends rigid doctrines, undergoing a process of self-transformation. Unaffected by external values or influences, he achieves significant and meaningful accomplishments. Some philosophers often compare Nietzsche’s overman to the Buddhist "spiritually awakened man". Both philosophies are primarily human-centric and serve as radical "therapies" for the crisis of human suffering and the collapse of traditional meaning.
Friedrich Nietzsche's work is widely recognized not only as philosophy but as a powerful form of therapy and psychological inquiry. His approach focuses on individual transformation and the affirmation of life rather than clinical "repair. Viktor Frankl’s Logotherapy is recognized as having deep roots in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy, particularly regarding the role of meaning in human endurance
Nietzsche remains arguably the most influential philosopher of the modern era because he diagnosed the psychological and cultural crises that continue to define the 21st century. Nietzsche gave us the courage to question our convictions. He was the neo-Socrates, rather the neo-Socrates of subjectivity. We can say that Nietzsche was the son of Charles Darwin and the brother of Bismarck.
The therapeutic functions of poetry in mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Our newest paper, published in Psychiatry Research
by Dr. Anthony Kassab / Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge / Dr. Rami Bou Khalil
Kassab A, Jayatunge R, Bou Khalil R. The therapeutic functions of poetry in mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2025 Dec 11;356:116897. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2025.
Background: Poetry therapy whether using reading, writing, or discussing poems in a therapeutic context, is increasingly applied in mental and physical health care, yet its empirical support remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of poetry-based interventions across psychiatric and somatic outcomes.
Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched up to November 2023 for original studies evaluating poetry-based interventions on mental or physical health outcomes. Studies in English or French using individual or group poetry activities were eligible. Fifteen studies (randomized controlled, case-control, and pre-post designs) met inclusion criteria; those scoring ≥6 on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were included in the meta-analysis. Random-effects models were used to pool standardized mean differences for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety, resilience, stress, and perceived pain. Heterogeneity, prediction intervals, and publication bias (Egger's test) were assessed.
Results: Poetry-based interventions were associated with large reductions in PTSD symptoms and significant improvements in depressive symptoms, anxiety, and stress, with effect sizes generally in the moderate-to-large range. In contrast, effects on resilience were statistically non-significant and highly imprecise, and no reliable benefit was found for perceived pain, where heterogeneity and evidence of small-study effects were substantial. Across outcomes, most trials were small, at risk of bias, and methodologically heterogeneous.
Conclusions: Poetry therapy shows promising benefits for trauma-related, depressive, anxiety, and stress outcomes, but the evidence base is limited by small samples, variable quality, and potential publication bias. High-quality, preregistered randomized controlled trials are needed before poetry-based interventions can be firmly recommended beyond an adjunctive role in routine psychiatric care.
Friday, December 19, 2025
King Ravana is a Legendary Figure rather than a Documented Historical Individual
King Ravana is recognized as the primary antagonist in the ancient Hindu epic Ramayana, characterized as a ten-headed demon king from Sri Lanka. The question of his historical existence is contentious, lacking definitive archaeological evidence such as inscriptions or skeletal remains to substantiate his life. The discourse surrounding Ravana's potential existence in what is now Sri Lanka is deeply intertwined with traditional beliefs, literary interpretations, and academic inquiry, yet no archaeological findings have conclusively confirmed his historical reality. While many Sri Lankans and Hindus regard Sri Lanka as Ravana's kingdom, some scholars have suggested alternative locations. Notably, the Ram Setu, or Adam's Bridge, is often referenced as a construction by Rama's forces to access Ravana's realm; however, scientific assessments indicate it may be a submerged man-made structure dating back 3,500 to 5,000 years, with some geologists arguing for its natural origins.
Historians frequently view the Ramayana as a symbolic tale derived from folk narratives that illustrate the expansion of Indo-Aryan tribes and their interactions with indigenous groups like the Goths, Kols, and Bhils. The earliest versions of Valmiki's Sanskrit text are believed to have been composed between the 7th and 4th centuries BCE, with a rare 6th-century manuscript found in the Asiatic Society Library in Kolkata, notable for its omission of the first and last books, suggesting later additions to Valmiki's original narrative. Furthermore, extensive excavations at Ayodhya and other locations mentioned in the Ramayana have not produced specific artifacts, such as inscriptions or royal seals, that would definitively link these sites to the events or time period described in the epic.
The Ramayana, along with the character of Ravana, serves as a mythical epic poem designed to impart lessons on Dharma, rather than being a factual narrative.