Thursday, December 25, 2025

Unpacking Friedrich Nietzsche



Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge 

Friedrich Nietzsche is considered an existential philosopher primarily because he shifted the focus of philosophy from abstract metaphysics to the lived experience of the individual and the urgent problem of finding meaning in an indifferent universe. He is a radical philosopher because he sought to systematically dismantle the most fundamental pillars of Western civilization—including its religion, morality, and concepts of truth.

Nietzsche asserted that facts do not exist independently; rather, they are shaped by interpretations -(Nietzsche stated that there are no facts, only interpretations). He proposed a cultural philosophy that stands in contrast to the concept of nature, arguing that human beings lack inherent values. In his view, humans are akin to predatory animals, and he dismissed the notion that suffering holds any intrinsic value or meaning. For Nietzsche, strength represented the highest virtue, and he expressed admiration for figures like Wagner, celebrated ideals of masculinity, and explored the concept of the "will to power."

Nietzsche's approach to philosophy was marked by a provocative and destructive style, often described as "philosophizing with a hammer." His writings contain elements of racism, antisemitism, cruelty, and misogyny, yet his influence on Western thought remains undeniable. There are no universally accepted interpretations of his work; instead, it is characterized by contradictory and paradoxical ideas that challenge conventional understanding.

In many ways, Friedrich Nietzsche can be accurately described as a poet-philosopher. He used artistic, musical, and metaphorical language. Nietzsche used oxymorons and paradoxes intentionally to mirror his belief that reality is not a fixed, logical system, but a fluid and contradictory process of "becoming". Nietzsche wanted to "be understood by being misunderstood.

Friedrich Nietzsche did serve as a medical orderly during the Franco-Prussian War (1870–1871) and witnessed traumatic events; there is no clinical evidence that he suffered from "war neurosis." However, the war trauma transformed him, and his later focus on Power was not a glorification of military dominance but a psychological reaction to the weakness he witnessed in both the victims and the victors of war.

Power is central to Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy because he viewed the "Will to Power" as the fundamental driving force of all existence. It is a metaphysical and psychological description of life itself. He believed that life is not merely a struggle for survival but a proactive effort to grow, expand, and discharge strength. For Nietzsche, the highest form of power was internally directed rather than the political domination of others.

Nietzsche was born into a devout family, and his initial affection for Christianity was profound. However, the premature deaths of his father and brother prompted him to adopt a more critical perspective on the faith. This psychological upheaval catalyzed his transformation into what he later termed an anti-Christ. In subsequent years, he emerged as a formidable critic of Christianity and metaphysics alike, embracing the title "anti-Christ" as a badge of honor.

Friedrich Nietzsche's proclamation that "God is dead" remains one of the most significant yet frequently misinterpreted statements in Western philosophy. By the statement "God is dead," Nietzsche meant that the cultural and psychological authority of the Christian God had become "unbelievable" and obsolete in the modern era. He argued that God—the traditional anchor for absolute truth, morality, and purpose—had lost its power to command the modern mind. It's the loss of metaphysical authority over humans.

Nietzsche contended that Christianity represented a religion of subjugation, particularly for the Jews during the Roman Empire, who found themselves powerless against their oppressors. In response to their suffering, Christianity offered the promise of an afterlife filled with joy and liberation. However, Nietzsche criticized this notion as a deceptive form of consolation that ultimately hindered individuals from confronting and transforming their present hardships. He believed that such a false hope for a better existence beyond death discouraged meaningful action to alleviate their current struggles. 

Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of herd morality is defined as a collective value system based on common social norms, societal standards, and the desire for conformity. Nietzsche viewed traditional morality not as a set of helpful rules, but as a "danger of dangers"—a systematic impediment that stifles human excellence and prevents the emergence of the "higher type" of human being. Nietzsche argued that people stick to "herd morality" not because it is true or right, but because it provides vital psychological and survival benefits for the "weak" majority. Nietzsche posited that humanity exists within the realm of nature rather than under the influence of a divine or celestial order.

Friedrich Nietzsche believed humans were blind to natural selection, not divine selection, and were destined for extinction. Nietzsche’s view is that all religious and divine values are human constructs. Moral laws are human creations that have no transcendent value.

Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy is called life-affirming because its ultimate goal is to move beyond the despair of meaninglessness (nihilism) and "say yes" to life exactly as it is—including its suffering, chaos, and cruelty.

Nietzsche categorized nihilism into three distinct types: passive, active, and complete. The passive nihilist acknowledges the demise of traditional values, such as God and objective morality, yet responds with a sense of weary resignation to the apparent void of meaning in life. In contrast, the active nihilist reacts with anger and resentment, aggressively dismantling outdated beliefs but ultimately fails to establish new values. The complete nihilist, on the other hand, fully comprehends that the highest values, including God, universal morality, and objective truth, have lost their significance.

Nietzsche's overman is a radical psychological and creative transformation. The overman transcends rigid doctrines, undergoing a process of self-transformation. Unaffected by external values or influences, he achieves significant and meaningful accomplishments. Some philosophers often compare Nietzsche’s overman to the Buddhist "spiritually awakened man". Both philosophies are primarily human-centric and serve as radical "therapies" for the crisis of human suffering and the collapse of traditional meaning.

Friedrich Nietzsche's work is widely recognized not only as philosophy but as a powerful form of therapy and psychological inquiry. His approach focuses on individual transformation and the affirmation of life rather than clinical "repair. Viktor Frankl’s Logotherapy is recognized as having deep roots in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy, particularly regarding the role of meaning in human endurance

Nietzsche remains arguably the most influential philosopher of the modern era because he diagnosed the psychological and cultural crises that continue to define the 21st century. Nietzsche gave us the courage to question our convictions. He was the neo-Socrates, rather the neo-Socrates of subjectivity. We can say that Nietzsche was the son of Charles Darwin and the brother of Bismarck. 












The therapeutic functions of poetry in mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis




Our newest paper, published in Psychiatry Research

by Dr. Anthony Kassab / Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge / Dr. Rami Bou Khalil  

Kassab A, Jayatunge R, Bou Khalil R. The therapeutic functions of poetry in mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2025 Dec 11;356:116897. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116897. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41411711.

Background: Poetry therapy whether using reading, writing, or discussing poems in a therapeutic context, is increasingly applied in mental and physical health care, yet its empirical support remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of poetry-based interventions across psychiatric and somatic outcomes.

Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched up to November 2023 for original studies evaluating poetry-based interventions on mental or physical health outcomes. Studies in English or French using individual or group poetry activities were eligible. Fifteen studies (randomized controlled, case-control, and pre-post designs) met inclusion criteria; those scoring ≥6 on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were included in the meta-analysis. Random-effects models were used to pool standardized mean differences for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety, resilience, stress, and perceived pain. Heterogeneity, prediction intervals, and publication bias (Egger's test) were assessed.

Results: Poetry-based interventions were associated with large reductions in PTSD symptoms and significant improvements in depressive symptoms, anxiety, and stress, with effect sizes generally in the moderate-to-large range. In contrast, effects on resilience were statistically non-significant and highly imprecise, and no reliable benefit was found for perceived pain, where heterogeneity and evidence of small-study effects were substantial. Across outcomes, most trials were small, at risk of bias, and methodologically heterogeneous.

Conclusions: Poetry therapy shows promising benefits for trauma-related, depressive, anxiety, and stress outcomes, but the evidence base is limited by small samples, variable quality, and potential publication bias. High-quality, preregistered randomized controlled trials are needed before poetry-based interventions can be firmly recommended beyond an adjunctive role in routine psychiatric care.

 

Friday, December 19, 2025

King Ravana is a Legendary Figure rather than a Documented Historical Individual



King Ravana is recognized as the primary antagonist in the ancient Hindu epic Ramayana, characterized as a ten-headed demon king from Sri Lanka. The question of his historical existence is contentious, lacking definitive archaeological evidence such as inscriptions or skeletal remains to substantiate his life. The discourse surrounding Ravana's potential existence in what is now Sri Lanka is deeply intertwined with traditional beliefs, literary interpretations, and academic inquiry, yet no archaeological findings have conclusively confirmed his historical reality. While many Sri Lankans and Hindus regard Sri Lanka as Ravana's kingdom, some scholars have suggested alternative locations. Notably, the Ram Setu, or Adam's Bridge, is often referenced as a construction by Rama's forces to access Ravana's realm; however, scientific assessments indicate it may be a submerged man-made structure dating back 3,500 to 5,000 years, with some geologists arguing for its natural origins. 

Historians frequently view the Ramayana as a symbolic tale derived from folk narratives that illustrate the expansion of Indo-Aryan tribes and their interactions with indigenous groups like the Goths, Kols, and Bhils. The earliest versions of Valmiki's Sanskrit text are believed to have been composed between the 7th and 4th centuries BCE, with a rare 6th-century manuscript found in the Asiatic Society Library in Kolkata, notable for its omission of the first and last books, suggesting later additions to Valmiki's original narrative. Furthermore, extensive excavations at Ayodhya and other locations mentioned in the Ramayana have not produced specific artifacts, such as inscriptions or royal seals, that would definitively link these sites to the events or time period described in the epic.

The Ramayana, along with the character of Ravana, serves as a mythical epic poem designed to impart lessons on Dharma, rather than being a factual narrative.

Thursday, December 18, 2025

රාවණා මිත්‍යාව




පුරාණ හින්දු වීර කාව්‍යයක් වන රාමායණයේ ප්‍රධාන විරුද්ධවාදියා ලෙස රාවණා රජු නම් කෙරෙන අතර , එහිදී ඔහු ලංකාවේ හිස් දහයක් ඇති යක්‍ෂ රජු ලෙස නිරූපණය කෙරේ. ඔහුගේ ජීවිතය සත්‍යාපනය කිරීම සඳහා සෙල්ලිපි හෝ ඇටසැකිලි අවශේෂ වැනි නිශ්චිත පුරාවිද්‍යාත්මක සාක්‍ෂි නොමැති බැවින් ඔහුගේ ඓතිහාසික පැවැත්ම විවාදාත්මක කාරණයක් ලෙස පවතී. රාවණා වර්තමානයේ ශ්‍රී ලංකාව ලෙස හඳුන්වන ප්‍රදේශයේ වාසය කළේද යන්න පිළිබඳ විවාදය සාම්ප්‍රදායික විශ්වාසයන්, සාහිත්‍ය අර්ථකථන සහ ශාස්ත්‍රීය පර්‍යේෂණ සමඟ බැඳී ඇත. නමුත් මේ දක්වා ඒ පිලිබඳව පුරාවිද්‍යාත්මක සාක්‍ෂි නොමැත​. 

බොහෝ  ශ්‍රී ලාංකිකයන් සහ හින්දු භක්තිකයන්   ශ්‍රී ලංකාව රාවණාගේ රාජ්‍යය ලෙස සලකන අතර, විවිධ විද්වතුන් විකල්ප ස්ථාන යෝජනා කරති. අද වන විට, ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ හෝ ඉන්දියාවේ කිසිදු පුරාවිද්‍යාත්මක සොයාගැනීමක් ඓතිහාසික චරිතයක් ලෙස රාවණා පිළිබඳ නිශ්චිත සාක්‍ෂියක් ලෙස විශ්වීය වශයෙන් පිළිගෙන නොමැත. රාම් සේතු නොහොත් ආදම්ගේ පාලම බොහෝ විට රාවණාගේ රාජධානියට ප්‍රවේශ වීම සඳහා රාමගේ හමුදාවන් විසින් ඉදිකරන ලද ව්‍යුහයක් ජනප්‍රිය මතවාදයන් හුවා දැක්වූවද විද්‍යාත්මක සාක්‍ෂි   පෙන්නුම් කරන්නේ එය වසර 3,500 සිට 5,000 දක්වා දිවෙන ජලයෙන් යට වූ මිනිසා විසින් සාදන ලද නිර්මාණයක් විය හැකි බවයි, නමුත් බොහෝ භූ විද්‍යාඥයින් තර්ක කරන්නේ එය ස්වාභාවික සිදුවීමක් බවයි. 

ඉතිහාසඥයින් බොහෝ විට රාමායණය අර්ථකථනය කරන්නේ ඉන්දු-ආර්‍ය ගෝත්‍රිකයන්ගේ ව්‍යාප්තිය සහ ගොඬ්, කෝල් සහ භිල් වැනි ස්වදේශික ජනගහනය සමඟ ඔවුන්ගේ අන්තර්ක්‍රියා පිළිබිඹු කරන ජන කථා වලින් නිර්මානය වූ සංකේතාත්මක ආඛ්‍යානයක් ලෙස ය. විද්වත් වාර්තා  වලට අනුව වාල්මිකීගේ සංස්කෘත ග්‍රන්ථයේ මුල්ම අනුවාදයන් ක්‍රි.පූ. 7 සහ 4 වන සියවස් අතර රචනා කර ඇති අතර, කොල්කටාවේ ආසියාතික සංගමයේ පුස්තකාලයෙන් සොයා ගන්නා ලද දුර්ලභ 6 වන සියවසේ අත්පිටපතක් සමඟ. මෙම අත්පිටපත විශේෂයෙන් කැපී පෙනෙන්නේ එය පළමු සහ අවසාන පොත් වන බාල කන්ද සහ උත්තර කන්ද ඉවත් කර ඇති බැවින්, මෙම කොටස් පසුව වාල්මිකීගේ මුල් කෘතියට එකතු කරන ලද බවට අදහසක් පවතියි. තවද අයෝධ්‍යාවේ සහ රාමායණයේ  සඳහන් අනෙකුත් ස්ථානවල සිදු කරන ලද පුළුල් කැණීම්වලින්, රාමායණයේ  විස්තර කර ඇති සිදුවීම් හෝ යුගයට එම ස්ථාන සම්බන්ධ කරන සෙල්ලිපි, රාජකීය මුද්‍රා හෝ නිශ්චිත ආයුධ වැනි කිසිදු නිශ්චිත කෞතුක වස්තු හමු වී නොමැත.  අයෝධ්‍යාව වැනි ස්ථානවල පුරාවිද්‍යාත්මක සොයාගැනීම් බොහොමයක් ආසන්න වශයෙන් ක්‍රි.පූ. 800–1000 දක්වා දිවෙන අතර, එය සාමාන්‍යයෙන් සාම්ප්‍රදායික වාර්තාවල (වසර දහස් ගණනකට පෙර) රාමට පවරා ඇති යුගයට වඩා බොහෝ පසුකාලීන වේ. මේ අනුව රාමයණය සහ රාවනා යනු සත්‍ය කථාවක් නොව  ධර්මය ඉගැන්වීම සඳහා නිර්මාණය කරන ලද මිථ්‍යා වීර කාව්‍යයක් ලෙස හැඳින්විය හැක​.

Five Books are Ready for Purchase

 




1) Between Literature and Psychology ( Foreword   by  Professor Mary V. Seeman, OC MDCM, FRCPC DSc.  Professor Emerita    , Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto) 

2)  Psychological Aspects of Buddhist Jātaka Stories ( Foreword by 
 Rolf B. Gainer, PhD, Chief Executive Officer, Neurologic Rehabilitation Institute at Brookhaven Hospital, Tulsa, Oklahoma)

3) Shell Shock to Palali Syndrome: PTSD Sri Lankan Experience (Foreword by  Professor Richard N. Lalonde,   Department of Psychology, York University, Canada) 

4) PTSD in the Soviet Union ; (Foreword by Dr Gordon Atherley M.D., PhD   LLD, Honoris Causa, from Canada’s Simon Fraser University) 


5) Clinical Meditation (Foreword by Brian Rees, MD, MPH, Colonel (retired) US Army, Executive Director, TM for Veterans Director, Operation Warrior Wellness)
LINK;   https://transyl2014.blogspot.com/2023/08/my-book-on-clinical-meditation-is.html










Find Us On Facebook