by Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge M.D. PhD
The
rich tapestry of Sri Lanka's cultural heritage is intricately woven with
mythology and legends, which serve as a profound reflection of the island's
history and identity. These narratives, passed down through generations,
encompass a diverse array of tales that highlight the values, beliefs, and
traditions of the Sri Lankan people. The
mythological tale of Sinhabahu serves as a foundational narrative for the
Sinhala nation, intricately weaving together themes of identity, heritage, and
cultural pride.
Prof.
Gananath Obeyesekere argues that the myth of Sinhabahu serves as a
quintessential representation of the Sri Lankan Oedipus narrative. In his
notable work, "The Work of Culture: Symbolic Transformation in
Psychoanalysis and Anthropology," Prof. Obeyesekere highlights a particularly
striking aspect of the Sinhabahu myth: the complete absence of any expressions
of remorse or ethical dilemmas regarding the act of patricide. This lack of
moral conflict sets the myth apart, suggesting a cultural framework in which
such actions are not only accepted but perhaps even normalized, thereby
inviting deeper exploration into the implications of familial relationships and
societal values within the context of Sri Lankan folklore.
Sinhabahu Narrative
The
myth of Sinhabahu narrates the legendary beginnings of the Sinhala people, an
ethnic group indigenous to Sri Lanka. The Sinhalese communicate in Sinhala, an
Indo-Aryan language (Lewis, 2009), and the term "Sinhala" itself
translates to "lion people." Central to this mythology is the tale of
Princess Suppadevi from the Vanga Kingdom (situated in the eastern region of
the Indian Subcontinent) who was abducted by a fierce lion and taken into the
wilderness. During her time in captivity, she gave birth to twins: a son named
Sinhabahu, which means "hands like a lion's paws," and a daughter
named Sinha Seevali. The lion confined the family in a cave, sealing the
entrance with a massive rock.
At the
age of sixteen, Sinhabahu managed to lift the stone and escape with his mother
and sister to the Lala Kingdom, evading their captor. Upon discovering their
flight, the enraged lion rampaged through nearby villages in search of the
princess and her children, prompting the terrified villagers to implore their
king for assistance. The king then tasked Sinhabahu with confronting the lion,
leading the young hero to track down and slay the beast with a lethal arrow.
This act of bravery earned Sinhabahu the admiration of the people, who hailed
him as a hero.
Prince
Sinhabahu established a city known as Sinhapura, which translates to "The
Lion City." In a significant familial union, he married his sister, Sinha
Seevali, and together they welcomed a son named Vijaya. The chronicles of the
Mahawansa, a revered historical text, identify Prince Vijaya as the first documented
monarch of Sri Lanka, reigning from 543 BC to 505 BC. His ascension marked a
pivotal moment in the island's history, laying the foundation for a lineage
that would shape the cultural and political landscape of Sri Lanka for
centuries to come. The legacy of Sinhapura and its royal inhabitants continues
to resonate in the annals of Sri Lankan heritage, symbolizing the intertwining
of myth and history in the formation of a nation.
The
tale of Sinhabahu has been passed down through generations, embodying the
essence of oral tradition. These narratives often depict the evolution of their
heroes through a recurring motif of exile and return, which places them in
circumstances that continually test their strength and determination (Scot,
1990). Within these stories, archetypes emerge in various forms, including
typical characters, plotlines, imagery, and overarching themes, creating a rich
tapestry for analysis. One of the most prevalent archetypes found across
cultures is that of the hero and the hero's journey, a narrative framework that
resonates universally. This journey not only highlights the trials faced by the
hero but also reflects the values and beliefs of the culture from which the
story originates, making it a vital component of storytelling across different
societies.
Mythical Stories and Culture
Obeyesekere
probes into the rich tapestry of traditional folk tales, myths, and narratives
that characterize the cultural heritage of Sri Lanka, revealing a world imbued
with both myth and enigma. As an anthropologist, he meticulously examines the
stories that have been transmitted through generations, recognizing their
significance not only as entertainment but also as vessels of cultural identity
and collective memory. His analysis reveals underlying sociological and
psychological themes, suggesting that these folk narratives reflect societal
values, beliefs, and human experiences. Through this lens, Obeyesekere
highlights the intricate connections between folklore and the social fabric of
Sri Lankan life, illustrating how these tales encapsulate the complexities of
human nature and community dynamics.
The
tale of Sinhabahu is often regarded as a work of mythology, steeped in the rich
traditions and cultural narratives of its origins. A mythical story is a
traditional narrative that often carries deep symbolic meaning, serving to
illuminate the beliefs, historical events, and cultural practices of a
particular society. These tales frequently delve into the origins of the world,
the exploits of legendary heroes, and the actions of deities, providing insight
into the values and moral lessons that shape a community's identity. Through
rich imagery and allegorical elements, mythical stories not only entertain but
also educate, preserving the collective memory and wisdom of a culture for
generations. They act as a bridge between the past and present, allowing
individuals to connect with their heritage while exploring universal themes of
existence, morality, and the human experience.
Obeyesekere
investigates the intricate essence of traditional folk tales, offering a
comprehensive examination of their underlying themes and motifs. In his
analysis, he not only unravels the narrative structures and cultural
significance of these stories but also contextualizes them within their
historical and sociological frameworks. By doing so, he provides readers with a
deeper understanding of how these tales reflect the values, beliefs, and social
dynamics of the communities from which they originate. This multifaceted
approach allows for a richer appreciation of the folk tales, highlighting their
role as both artistic expressions and vital components of cultural heritage.
Mythical Narratives and the Collective Unconscious
The
mythical narrative of Sinhabahu explores universal human experiences and the
collective psyche and serves as a profound allegory for the timeless conflict
between primal instincts and the structures of civilization. Mythical
narratives such as Sinhabahu are deeply connected to the collective
unconscious. These mythical narratives posit a profound, universal aspect of
the human psyche that is shared among all individuals.
Archetypes
connected with the legend of Sinhabahu include the Hero (protagonist symbolic
idol Sinhabahu), the Shadow (repressed, or hidden, darker aspects of the
psyche), and the Father vs. Son, Authority
vs. Rebellion, and themes of the Oedipus complex and the tension between
Instinct vs. Civilization.
The
presence of these archetypes elucidates the striking similarities found in
mythological themes and motifs across diverse societies, suggesting a common
psychological heritage. These archetypes resonate deeply within the human
experience. These motifs not only influence our perceptions and emotions but
also guide our behaviors, providing a vital framework for comprehending and
integrating the more profound dimensions of the human psyche.
Carl
Jung's exploration revealed that these universal patterns transcend cultural
and historical boundaries, leading him to propose that a segment of the human
mind contains a collective unconscious, akin to a shared, primal memory that
connects all members of the human race. Numerous mythological tales, such as
Sinhabahu, exemplify this phenomenon, illustrating how ancient cultures have
woven similar narratives that resonate with the collective human experience.
It's unclear if Carl Jung was familiar with the Sinhabahu legend itself; though
there is no direct evidence that he wrote about it, his theories are applied to
it by later Sri Lankan scholars like Obeyesekere.
The Lion as a Totem Animal
The
lion, often referred to as a beast, serves as the father of Prince Sinhabahu,
who famously abducted his mother from her clan. This lion can be interpreted as
a metaphor for a man of extraordinary strength or even as a figure with a
lion-like visage, particularly relevant in the context of Hansen's disease,
where individuals may exhibit a leonine appearance.
The
lion has become a prominent totem for the people of Sri Lanka, particularly
within the Sinhalese community, largely inspired by the legendary narrative of
Sinhabahu. This majestic animal carries deep symbolic meaning for Sri Lankans,
serving as a powerful emblem that encapsulates their identity, values, and
cultural heritage.
The
lion not only signifies a connection to the past but also acts as a guiding
force, reflecting the community's relationship with nature and the spiritual
world. Through various forms of expression, including rituals, storytelling,
and art, the lion has woven itself into the fabric of societal traditions,
strengthening communal ties and fostering a sense of belonging that transcends
generations. As a totem, the lion embodies the essence of leadership, strength,
and courage, inspiring individuals to embrace resilience and self-confidence.
This revered creature symbolizes an inner fortitude that encourages people to
face challenges head-on, promoting active engagement and self-expression within
the community. The lion's role as a spiritual guide often signifies a pivotal
moment in personal growth, marking the beginning of a transformative journey
that aligns with the values and aspirations of the Sinhalese people.
The
lineage of Prince Sinhabahu, traced back to a lion, symbolizes the embodiment
of masculine power and vigor. Such symbolic representations are deeply rooted
in social, ideological, and political constructs, as noted by Miller (2011),
which is why the lion has come to represent the 'Sinhala' race. Across various
cultures, lions are revered for their innate qualities of strength, nobility,
and bravery, traits that resonate universally. Their status as apex predators
positions them as protectors against malevolence, while their majestic presence
conveys dignity, authority, and leadership. This widespread admiration has led
to their incorporation into religious practices, mythological narratives,
heraldic traditions, and use as guardians in both ancient and contemporary
societies.
Carl
Jung posited that animals often symbolize instinctual drives, with the lion
serving as an archetype for the Sinhalese people. These instinctual drives are
the carriers of the collective unconscious's symbolic patterns and represent
primal energies, and they have become a driving force in civilization.
As
discussed by Jutta von Buchholtz (2000) at the core of any symbol lies a vital
energy, whether instinctual or archetypal, often referred to as libido or
anima. The anima, in particular, is a
specific archetype representing the feminine aspect within the male psyche.
As we
can see, Sinhabahu embodied a multifaceted biopsychosocial dynamic, reflecting
a rich interplay of biological, psychological, and social influences that
shaped his character. Within his male psyche, there existed an unconscious
feminine dimension, which contributed to his emotional depth and complexity.
This aspect manifested in various traits, including a profound sense of
compassion, an innate receptivity to the feelings of others, and a strong
intuition that guided his interactions.
The
lion is often perceived as a symbol of strength and power, yet it also embodies
significant feminine qualities, particularly through the representation of the
lioness. The lioness is emblematic of nurturing instincts, showcasing a fierce
dedication to protecting her young and her pride. This female" totem has aspects
of the divine feminine.
The Lion—the Emblem of Sinhalese Identity
The
lion has emerged as a powerful symbol of Sinhalese identity, deeply rooted in
ancient folklore and its association with the island's inaugural monarch,
Prince Vijaya. This connection is primarily derived from the Sinhabahu legend,
which narrates the tale of Sinhabahu, a lion-man who is said to be the
progenitor of the Sinhalese people. According to this legend, Sinhabahu, born
of a lion and a human princess, embodies strength, courage, and nobility,
traits that resonate with the Sinhalese culture. As Prince Vijaya, a descendant
of Sinhabahu, established his reign in Sri Lanka, the lion became an enduring
emblem of the Sinhalese heritage, representing not only royal lineage but also
the resilience and identity of the Sinhalese people throughout history. This rich
tapestry of myth and history has solidified the lion's status as a national
symbol, reflecting the pride and unity of the Sinhalese community.
The
lion has long served as a powerful emblem of Sinhalese identity, much like the
peacock represented the Mauryas, the fish symbolized the Pandyas, and the tiger
stood for the Cholas. This majestic creature is deeply woven into the
historical narrative of Sri Lanka, with King Dutugemunu famously carrying a
lion flag during his legendary battle against Elara, a moment immortalized in a
painting at the Dambulla temple from the Kandyan period. Furthermore, the
Sinhalese kings of Anuradhapura minted coins adorned with the lion, reinforcing
its significance in their reign. Additionally, King Kashyapa's creation of a colossal
lion statue at Sigiriya exemplifies the lion's enduring status as a national
symbol, reflecting the pride and cultural heritage of the Sinhalese people
throughout the ages.
Bestiality
Narrated in the Sinhabahu Story
The Sinhabahu legend contains complex themes,
including the controversial subject of bestiality. Bestiality, defined as sexual intercourse
between humans and animals, raises significant ethical, legal, and moral
concerns across various societies. This practice is often viewed as taboo.
This ancient narrative, rooted in the
cultural and historical context of its origin, presents a tale that intertwines
human and animal characteristics, ultimately exploring the boundaries of
morality and nature. Sinhabahu, a character born from a union between a lion
and a human, symbolizes the intersection of the primal instincts of the animal
kingdom with the rationality of humanity. The story raises profound questions
about identity, lineage, and the consequences of transgressing natural laws.
In the tale of Sinhabahu, the narrative
unfolds with Princess Suppadevi, who is journeying to Magadha as part of a
caravan. During this voyage, an unexpected and ferocious lion attacks the
caravan, leading to the abduction of Suppadevi. In a twist of fate, she becomes
the mate of the lion, resulting in the birth of two remarkable offspring:
Sinhabahu and Sinhasivali. The historian chronicles this extraordinary event,
emphasizing the unique lineage of Sinhabahu and Sinhasivali as the progeny of a
human woman and a lion, thus intertwining the realms of the natural and the
mythical. This story not only highlights the themes of transformation and
identity but also explores the complexities of human-animal relationships
within the context of ancient narratives.
Throughout
history, numerous cultures have woven tales that explore the theme of
bestiality, reflecting a complex interplay between human desires and societal
taboos. These narratives often serve as cautionary tales, illustrating the
consequences of transgressing natural boundaries and the moral dilemmas
associated with such acts.
The
cultural implications of bestiality differ significantly across various
societies, encompassing a wide range of historical, mythological, and
ritualistic contexts. In some cultures, it is intertwined with specific rites
or considered a forbidden practice, while in others, it appears in modern media
portrayals that often mirror societal fears or notions of moral transgression.
Although bestiality is frequently regarded as a taboo subject in many parts of
the world, there are historical instances where it has been recognized as a
form of sexual expression. The ancient Egyptian religious customs included
elements that could be interpreted as bestiality, illustrating its varied
significance throughout history.
In
mythology, the theme of bestiality carries profound cultural implications that
extend beyond mere taboo. It serves to delineate the distinctions between human
and divine realms, often reflecting societal anxieties surrounding sexuality
and the institution of marriage. These narratives frequently delve into the
complexities of desire, illustrating how the intertwining of human and
animalistic traits can symbolize deeper connections to the natural world.
Furthermore, bestiality in myth acts as a powerful metaphor for the primal
forces of power and lust, revealing the underlying tensions between
civilization and the wild. Through these stories, cultures grapple with their
fears and fascinations, using the motif of bestiality to explore the boundaries
of morality and the essence of human nature itself.
As
Sinhabahu navigates his existence, the myth serves as a reflection on the
darker aspects of desire and the societal implications of such unions,
prompting audiences to confront their own perceptions of normalcy and taboo.
Through its vivid imagery and allegorical depth, the myth invites a critical
examination of the human condition and the often-blurred lines between
civilization and the wild.
The
Oedipus complex emerges during Freud's phallic stage of development, which
typically occurs between the ages of three and six. During this critical
period, a young boy begins to experience unconscious feelings of attraction
towards his mother, while simultaneously perceiving his father as a competitor
for her affection. This internal conflict often leads to intense emotions such
as jealousy and anger, as well as a profound fear of castration, which
represents the boy's anxiety regarding potential retribution from his father.
According to psychoanalytic theory, resolving these complex feelings is
essential for forming a robust psychological identity and developing the
superego. This resolution is achieved when the child identifies with the father
figure, thereby suppressing his desires for the mother and internalizing
paternal values, which ultimately contributes to a healthier psychological
framework as he matures.
The
term "Sri Lankan Oedipus" refers to the legend of Sinhabahu, a
mythical figure credited with founding the Sinhala people, and it draws
intriguing parallels to the Greek myth of Oedipus. Both narratives revolve
around a central character who unwittingly engages in patricide and incest,
resulting in profound consequences that shape their respective cultures. In
Sinhabahu's story, this tragic fate is symbolized through a totemic
relationship with a lion, which serves as a powerful emblem of national
identity and heritage. Furthermore, the influence of Sophocles' "Oedipus
Rex" is evident in Sri Lanka, where adaptations and performances of the
classic play have been integrated into the local cultural landscape. This
connection not only highlights the shared themes of fate and familial conflict
but also underscores the enduring impact of these myths on the formation of
national narratives and theatrical traditions in Sri Lanka.
Dr.
Wijaya Dissanayaka, a distinguished consultant psychiatrist and respected
lecturer, posits that many narratives center around the theme of a hero
vanquishing a formidable beast or dragon. This recurring motif, he argues,
serves as a profound representation of the Oedipal conflict, a concept rooted
in psychoanalytic theory. The act of slaying the dragon can be interpreted as a
symbolic confrontation with paternal authority, where the hero's triumph
signifies a resolution of inner turmoil and the quest for identity. Through
this lens, these stories not only entertain but also delve into the
complexities of human psychology, reflecting the struggles individuals face in
reconciling their desires and familial relationships.
In the
narrative of Sinhabahu, parallels can be drawn to the classic tale of Oedipus,
particularly in the tragic act of patricide, as Sinhabahu also kills his
father. However, a significant divergence exists in their respective stories;
unlike Oedipus, who unwittingly marries his mother, Sinhabahu chooses to marry
his sister instead. This crucial difference highlights the unique aspects of
the Sinhabahu tale, positioning it as a semi-Oedipal narrative. While both
stories explore themes of fate, familial conflict, and the consequences of
one's actions, the resolution in Sinhabahu's story diverges from the archetypal
tragedy of Oedipus, offering a distinct interpretation of similar motifs within
the realm of mythological storytelling.
Buddhist
philosophy, particularly as illustrated in the narrative of the Thayo Darma
Jātakaya encompasses profound themes that parallel the Oedipus complex,
including elements such as parental abandonment, the act of patricide, and the
intense rivalry for parental affection. The Thayo Darma Jātakaya highlights a
son's tumultuous quest to overthrow his father and ascend to the throne.
In this
narrative, the father-king embodies a figure who actively stifles the growth of
his male heirs, preventing them from reaching maturity and posing a challenge
to his authority. However, one son manages to evade this oppressive fate,
fueled by a burgeoning animosity towards his father, which is secretly nurtured
by his mother’s support. This complex relationship culminates in the son’s
violent act of patricide, as he seeks to seize not only the throne but also the
companionship of women associated with his father. The story intricately weaves
together the fundamental aspects of the Oedipus complex, including the intense
conflict between father and son, the rivalry for maternal affection, and the
son’s relentless pursuit of power, thereby offering a profound exploration of
familial dynamics and the darker facets of ambition.
Patricide in the Sinhabahu Story
Prince
Sinhabahu, a figure of both valor and tragedy, found himself in a harrowing situation
that would forever alter the course of his life. Sinhabahu confronted his
father. The confrontation culminated in a dramatic and fateful encounter, where
the prince, fueled by a mix of courage and sorrow, ultimately took the life of
Sinha. Finally, he had to kill his own father. He killed the totem animal.
The act
of Sinhabahu killing his father carries profound significance within the
narrative, symbolizing a complex interplay of destiny, power, and familial
conflict. The act itself can be interpreted as a tragic assertion of autonomy,
where Sinhabahu, in a desperate bid to escape the shadow of paternal authority,
commits an irreversible act that alters the course of his life and the lives of
those around him.
Freud defines patricide as the act of killing
one's father, which he interprets as a manifestation of the unconscious desire
to remove the paternal rival within the framework of the Oedipus complex. He
further theorizes that this concept extends beyond individual psychology to
encompass a collective phenomenon, wherein a group of brothers collectively
murders the "primal father" of a primitive horde. This act, according
to Freud, serves as a foundational moment in the development of civilization,
morality, religion, and social structures. The repercussions of such a primal
act lead to feelings of collective guilt among the brothers, which in turn
fosters the creation of the totem—a symbolic representation of the slain father
that embodies both reverence and remorse. This intricate interplay of familial
dynamics and societal evolution underscores Freud's belief in the profound
psychological underpinnings of human culture and social organization.
Patricide,
defined as the act of killing one's father, transcends mere literal
interpretation and instead serves as a profound symbolic archetype within the
collective unconscious. This concept, introduced by Carl Jung, refers to a
deep-seated psychological framework that is universally shared among humanity,
encompassing archetypes that reflect common human experiences and conflicts. In
this context, patricide symbolizes the struggle against paternal authority, the
rejection of established traditions, and the dynamic tension between
generations, where the younger generation seeks to challenge and ultimately
supplant the older one. This archetype is vividly illustrated in various myths
and narratives across different cultures, highlighting a fundamental human
conflict that resonates through time and space, revealing the complexities of
familial relationships and societal evolution.
Freud
proposed a theory centered around the concept of a primitive horde,
characterized by an all-powerful father figure. This dynamic culminates in the
fratricidal act of the brothers who conspire to kill their father, an event that
subsequently paves the way for the emergence of the totemic clan. This
theoretical framework explores the psychological conditions that allow such
thoughts to manifest.
Sinhabahu's
decision to kill his father stemmed from a series of tragic events that
unfolded after he, his mother, and his sister fled from the lion's den.
Following their escape, the lion became frantic and made desperate attempts to
find his missing wife and children, causing havoc in the villages and bringing
widespread fear and distress among the people.
In
response to the chaos, the king, despite having a formidable army at his
disposal, found himself unable to capture the rampaging lion, prompting him to
offer a substantial reward to anyone who could successfully tame the beast. Although
Sinhabahu's mother, Suppa Devi, attempted to dissuade him from taking on this
perilous task, he secretly approached the king and accepted the challenge.
However, unlike the king's intention to tame the lion, Sinhabahu harbored a
different motive; armed with an arrow, he ventured into the forest with the
intent to kill the lion. Upon reaching the lion's den, the lion recognized his
son, and despite the circumstances, he refrained from attacking Sinhabahu,
driven by a deep-seated love for him. Seizing this moment of hesitation,
Sinhabahu shot an arrow at his father's head, ultimately piercing it and
bringing about the lion's death.
The
motivations behind Sinhabahu's decision to kill his father, the lion, prompt a
complex exploration of familial dynamics and personal ambition. Despite
possessing the remarkable ability to subdue the lion without inflicting fatal
harm, Sinhabahu chose a path of violence, raising questions about his
underlying feelings toward his father. Was there an element of resentment or
hatred that drove him to commit such an act? It is possible that he perceived
his father not merely as a parent but as a formidable rival, one whose
dominance he sought to challenge and ultimately overthrow. This desire to
assert his own strength and independence could have been a significant factor
in his actions, suggesting a deeper psychological struggle between loyalty and
the need for self-assertion. The act of killing his father may symbolize a
broader quest for power and identity, reflecting the intricate interplay of
love, rivalry, and the quest for autonomy that often characterizes complex
familial relationships.
Killing of the Totem Animal
Sinhabahu
made a fateful decision to eliminate the totem animal that held significant
cultural and spiritual importance to his community. This totem, revered for its
symbolic representation of strength and protection, was not merely an animal
but a vital part of the tribe's identity and heritage.
Sinhabahu
embarked on a perilous journey into the heart of the wilderness. After a tense
and arduous pursuit, Sinhabahu finally confronted the formidable creature, his
heart pounding with determination. With a steady hand and unwavering focus, he
released a well-aimed arrow that struck true, bringing the ferocious lion to a
swift end. Hence, he killed the totem animal. Within the narrative, it
symbolizes a complex interplay of destiny, power, and familial conflict.
Killing
a totem animal is regarded as a serious breach of the cultural agreement
between individuals and the natural world, as well as a failure to uphold one's
obligations to their clan and community. It is a profound violation of a sacred
taboo, which can result in dire spiritual repercussions.
Dr.
Vamik Volkan, Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Virginia, luminously
writes on the killing of the totem animal, or the patricide, thus.
Long
ago, primitive people lived in small tribes led by despotic leaders. With his
unlimited power, the leader or father considered all the women of the tribe his
exclusive property. If the young men of the tribe, or sons, expressed jealousy,
they were killed, castrated, or excommunicated. Their fate unbearable, the
young men joined forces, killed the father, and ate him. But the father’s
influence would not disappear. In death he became more powerful. Haunted by the
ghost of their father, the sons replaced him with a horrible and strong animal,
a totem. It absorbed the sons’ ambivalence—the simultaneous hate and love they
were experiencing for their dead father. Since the ghost of their father lived
in the totem, however, the sons were still not free of his influence, and their
hate for him, as well as their love for him, continued. Totemism is thus both a
religious and a social system.” (Hence, the totem animal was used to maintain
two useful prohibitions—one against killing the totem animal (patricide) and
the other against having sexual relations with women of the same totem or clan
(incest).(Totem and Taboo in Romania: A Psychopolitical Diagnosis—Dr. Vamik
Volkan)
However,
the concept of "killing one's spirit animal" has emerged in
contemporary discourse as a metaphor for personal transformation, suggesting
that such an act, whether literal or figurative, can serve as a powerful
catalyst for addressing and confronting deeper spiritual or personal
challenges. This duality highlights the complexity of the relationship between
individuals and their totem animals, where the act of killing can
simultaneously represent a violation of sacred bonds and an opportunity for profound
self-reflection and growth.
Patricide Described in the Mahabharata and
in the Other Ancient Mythical Stories
The
ancient Indian epic Mahabharata and the Sri Lankan myth of Sinhabahu exhibit no
recorded parallels in their narratives or themes. The Mahabharata is a
monumental text that chronicles the intense dynastic struggle between two
factions, the Pandavas and the Kauravas, ultimately leading to the climactic
and devastating Battle of Kurukshetra. This epic not only explores the
complexities of duty, righteousness, and moral dilemmas faced by its characters
but also delves into the broader implications of war and its consequences on
society.
In
contrast, the Sinhabahu myth serves as a foundational story for the Sinhala
people, detailing the legendary origins of their nation through the tale of a
princess who unites with a lion, resulting in the birth of twin sons. This
narrative emphasizes themes of identity, lineage, and the intertwining of human
and animal realms, reflecting the cultural and historical significance of the
Sinhala heritage. Thus, while both texts are rich in their respective cultural
contexts, they remain distinct in their storytelling and thematic focus.
The
narratives found in both the Mahabharata and the Sinhabahu tales prominently
feature the theme of parricide, a grave act that carries profound moral and
ethical implications.
In the
epic narrative of the Mahabharata, one of the most poignant instances of
patricide unfolds when Babruvahana, unaware of his true lineage, fatally wounds
his father, Arjuna, with an arrow. This tragic event occurs during the
Ashwamedha Yagna, a significant ritual that symbolizes royal authority and
sovereignty. The backdrop of this act is steeped in a curse laid upon Arjuna by
the river goddess Ganga, who sought retribution for the death of her son,
Bhishma, at the hands of Arjuna. Ganga's curse foretold that Arjuna would meet
his end at the hands of his own offspring, a fate that Babruvahana unwittingly
fulfills in a moment of conflict.
Similarly,
the Sinhabahu story explores the consequences of such actions, where the
protagonist's struggle against his lineage and the resulting violence against
his father highlight the tragic dimensions of duty, honor, and the quest for
power.
These
narratives not only serve as cautionary tales but also delve into the
psychological turmoil faced by characters who grapple with their identities and
the weight of their actions, ultimately reflecting on the broader themes of
fate, justice, and the moral dilemmas inherent in human relationships.
Patricide
emerges as a prominent motif in ancient epics, particularly within the realm of
Greek mythology, where it is vividly illustrated through the acts of Cronus,
who castrated his father Uranus, and the tragic tale of Oedipus, who
unwittingly killed his own father. These narratives delve into the theme of the
overthrow of established orders by the younger generation, often fueled by a
relentless quest for power or an inescapable fate.
Additionally,
the Babylonian epic Enûma Elish presents a parallel instance with the god Ea
slaying his father Apsu, while in Hurrian mythology, Teshub defeats Kumarbi,
both of which signify a recurring divine cycle of conflict and the generational
struggle for supremacy. Such stories not only reflect the complexities of
familial relationships but also serve as allegories for the broader societal
transitions and the inevitable clash between the old and the new.
Parricides Recorded in Ancient Sri Lankan
History
The
influence of Sinhabahu on the theme of parricide is profound and multifaceted,
reflecting deep cultural and psychological undercurrents within the narrative.
The earliest documented case of parricide in ancient Sri Lankan history
involves King Kashyapa (also known as Kassapa), who infamously killed his
father, King Dathusena, in a bid to usurp the throne during the 5th century CE.
Historical
narratives, including the accounts from Portuguese sources such as De Queros,
suggest that King Seethawaka Rajasinghe (reigned from approximately 1581 to
1592 AD) may have murdered his father, King Mayadunne. This claim, however,
remains a subject of considerable debate among historians. The allegation of
patricide is often associated with a broader conflict involving Buddhist monks,
which subsequently led to Rajasinghe's notable conversion to Hinduism. This
shift in religious allegiance is seen as a significant turning point in his
reign, reflecting the complex interplay of power, faith, and familial loyalty
during a tumultuous period in Sri Lankan history. The implications of these
events continue to resonate in discussions about the political and religious
dynamics of the time.
Sinhabahu and the Laius Syndrome
The
Laius Syndrome is a conceptual framework primarily derived from Silke-Maria
Weineck's (Professor of German and comparative literature at the University of
Michigan at Ann Arbor) analysis in "The Laius Syndrome, or the Ends of
Political Fatherhood." This term encapsulates the intricate and often
detrimental dynamics between a father and his son, drawing inspiration from the
mythological narrative of King Laius within the Oedipus mythos. In this
context, the father figure is emblematic of various themes, including the
exertion of political authority, the propensity for violence, the obsessive desire
to dictate one's lineage, and the tragic inevitability of fate. These elements
converge to illustrate a poignant narrative where the father's attempts to
control his destiny ultimately culminate in his own downfall at the hands of
his son. Notably, Laius Syndrome shares thematic parallels with the Sinhabahu
myth, further enriching the discourse on paternal relationships and the tragic
consequences of power and control.
Incest in the Sinhabahu Story
The
concept of incest is notably illustrated in ancient Sri Lankan folklore through
the tale of Sinhabahu, a significant legend that recounts the origins of the
Sinhala people. According to this narrative, Prince Sinhabahu, who is credited
with establishing the Sinhala lineage, entered into a union with his sister,
Sinha Seewali. This controversial marriage resulted in the birth of their son,
Prince Vijaya, who would go on to become the first king of Sri Lanka.
The
legend not only highlights the complexities of familial relationships in the
context of royal lineage but also serves as a foundational myth that shapes the
cultural identity of the Sinhala people. Through this story, themes of power,
destiny, and the intertwining of familial bonds are explored, reflecting the
intricate tapestry of Sri Lankan history and mythology.
The
legend of Sinhabahu narrates the tale of a prince who, in a controversial act,
wed his own sister, Sinha Seewali, thereby engaging in incestuous relations.
This narrative raises intriguing questions about the social norms and familial
structures of ancient societies.
Sontakke
(2017) suggests that in prehistoric times, there were likely no prohibitions
against mating among close relatives, indicating a vastly different
understanding of kinship and marriage compared to contemporary standards. Such
practices may have been influenced by various factors, including the need to
preserve lineage, consolidate power, or ensure the continuation of certain
bloodlines. This historical context invites further exploration into the
evolution of societal norms surrounding incest and the implications these
legends have on our understanding of ancient cultures.
Greek
mythology often explores the origins of various cultural deities, including
those associated with music and dance, through narratives of incestuous
relationships among divine figures. For instance, the siblings Shu and Tefnut
gave rise to Geb and Nut, who themselves were a brother-sister duo that
eventually entered into marriage. This pattern of familial unions continues
with their grandson Horus, who, in a strikingly complex twist of mythology,
chose his mother, Isis, as his consort. This relationship not only highlights
the intricate web of connections among the gods but also symbolizes the
intertwining of maternal and romantic bonds within the divine narrative,
reflecting the multifaceted nature of love and power in ancient Greek culture.
For
over three millennia, incestuous unions among siblings and other closely
related individuals were a prevalent cultural norm among the ancient Egyptian
pharaohs, primarily aimed at safeguarding the purity of the royal bloodline and
reinforcing the divine status attributed to the king. This practice ensured
that power and wealth remained concentrated within the royal family, thereby
maintaining a sense of continuity and stability in governance.
However,
the implications of such marriages were dire, as they significantly increased
the risk of genetic disorders, resulting in various health complications and
physical deformities among the offspring of these unions. A notable example of
this is Pharaoh Tutankhamun, whose remains exhibited several signs of genetic
abnormalities, underscoring the detrimental effects of these incestuous
practices on the health of the royal lineage.
The
incest taboo represents a nearly universal cultural norm that forbids sexual
relationships among close blood relatives, although its interpretation and
enforcement can differ significantly from one society to another. While the
majority of cultures uphold this prohibition, the specific relationships deemed
unacceptable can vary widely; for instance, some societies may allow marriages
between certain cousins, while others strictly prohibit such unions.
Additionally, various cultural myths, such as those depicting ancestral
siblings who survive cataclysmic events like floods and subsequently repopulate
the earth, illustrate the intricate and often contradictory nature of incest
within different cultural frameworks. These narratives not only reflect the
complexities surrounding familial relationships but also reveal how cultural
beliefs shape the understanding and acceptance of incestuous relationships in
diverse contexts.
Sinhabahu- the Archetypal Hero
The
figure of Sinhabahu exemplifies the archetypal hero, a character type that
transcends cultural boundaries and appears in narratives worldwide. This hero
embarks on a transformative journey, confronting various challenges that
ultimately lead to personal growth and the achievement of significant goals,
which often resonate deeply within their society. Central to this archetype is
the Hero's Journey, or monomyth, a narrative framework that encompasses a
departure from the familiar world, a series of trials and initiatory
experiences, and a return enriched with newfound wisdom or gifts intended for
the community. Essential traits of this archetypal hero include unwavering
courage, selflessness, a strong moral compass, and a readiness to make
sacrifices for the greater good. Through these qualities, Sinhabahu not only
navigates his own path but also leaves a lasting impact on those around him,
embodying the timeless essence of heroism that inspires and uplifts.
His
triumph over the lion firmly established him as the quintessential hero, a
notion thoroughly examined by Joseph Campbell in his seminal work, "The
Hero with a Thousand Faces" (1968). In this influential text, Campbell
articulates the essence of a hero as someone who ventures beyond the confines
of the mundane world to undertake a profound and transformative journey. Throughout
this odyssey, the hero confronts various challenges and personal fears,
ultimately striving to fulfill a quest that not only tests their mettle but
also serves to uplift and benefit their community. This archetypal narrative
underscores the hero's role as a catalyst for change, illustrating how their
extraordinary experiences resonate with universal themes of courage, sacrifice,
and the pursuit of a greater good.
The
archetypal hero holds profound significance within a culture, serving as a
universal template for both individual and societal advancement. This figure
inspires people to confront and surmount obstacles through acts of bravery and
selflessness, while simultaneously embodying the fundamental values and
aspirations of the culture from which it originates. Narratives such as the
Hero's Journey encapsulate these themes, providing a structured approach to
understanding personal transformation, ethical growth, and the victory of human
consciousness over various internal and external challenges. Through these
compelling stories, cultures foster a sense of collective identity and shared
ambition that resonates across generations, reinforcing the importance of
resilience and moral integrity in the face of adversity.
Sinhabahu
is revered as a quintessential hero within Sri Lankan culture, symbolizing the
archetypal journey of triumph over adversity and representing the mythological
roots of the Sinhala people. His narrative encapsulates the essence of
resilience and the struggle for identity, making him a pivotal figure in the
cultural consciousness. In contrast, Madduma Bandara epitomizes the child hero,
showcasing remarkable courage in the face of imminent execution, thus
highlighting the theme of innocence confronting grave challenges. Additionally,
other notable figures such as King Dutugamunu, Keppetipola Disawe and Puran
Appu emerge as significant heroes, each embodying distinct archetypes of
national resistance, cultural revival, and military strength. These warriors
not only reflect the valor and determination of their time but also serve as
enduring symbols of the collective spirit and heritage of the Sri Lankan
people, reinforcing the narrative of heroism that is deeply woven into the
fabric of the nation’s history.
Transformative Journey of Sinhabahu
The
transformative journey of Sinhabahu is a profound narrative that encapsulates
themes of identity, redemption, and the quest for belonging. Sinhabahu's early
life is marked by a struggle to reconcile his dual heritage, which sets the
stage for his eventual metamorphosis. As he navigates the complexities of his
existence, he faces numerous challenges that test his strength and resolve. His
journey is not merely a physical one; it is also an emotional and spiritual
odyssey that leads him to confront his fears and embrace his true self. Through
trials and tribulations, Sinhabahu evolves from a being caught between two
worlds into a figure of strength and leadership, ultimately finding his place
within the societal fabric. This transformation is not only significant for him
personally but also catalyzes change within his community, illustrating the
power of self-discovery and the importance of embracing one's roots.
The Connection Between Sinhabahu and Hindu
Mythology
The
narrative of Sinhabahu, a prominent figure in Sri Lankan folklore, exhibits
intriguing parallels with elements of Hindu mythology, particularly in its
themes of heroism, divine lineage, and the interplay between human and
supernatural realms. Sinhabahu is often depicted as a superhuman with enormous
strength and nobility. This dual heritage resonates with the Hindu concept of
avatars, where divine beings take on various forms to fulfill cosmic duties.
Furthermore, the tale of Sinhabahu's journey to establish a kingdom in Sri
Lanka mirrors the epic quests found in Hindu epics, such as the Ramayana and
Mahabharata, where protagonists face formidable challenges and engage in
battles that determine the fate of their realms. The lion, a symbol of power
and courage in both traditions, further cements the connection, as it appears
in various forms across Hindu texts, representing divine protection and royal
authority. Thus, the story of Sinhabahu not only enriches the cultural tapestry
of Sri Lanka but also reflects the broader themes present in Hindu mythology,
illustrating the shared narrative motifs that transcend geographical
boundaries.
Beowulf and Sinhabahu
The
ancient English epic poem Beowulf shares notable similarities with the tale of
Sinhabahu. Beowulf, recognized as the oldest surviving epic in the English
language, dates back to around 700 AD and has undergone numerous retellings
before being transcribed. This narrative follows the heroic journey of a prince
who confronts and defeats the fearsome monster Grendel, ultimately liberating
his people from terror. Both Beowulf and Sinhabahu, along with contemporary
narratives such as Star Wars, particularly the conflict between Luke Skywalker
and Darth Vader, illustrate a recurring theme of paternal conflict. In these
stories, the son often rises against the father's authority, embodying a primal
animosity that culminates in acts of patricide. This motif underscores a
deep-seated struggle for identity and power, reflecting the complexities of
familial relationships across different cultures and eras.
Although
Beowulf and the Sri Lankan myth of Sinhabahu originate from different cultural
backgrounds and possess unique storylines, they share several notable
similarities. Both narratives feature heroic protagonists who are of noble
descent, embodying the ideals of bravery and valor. Central to their tales is
the confrontation with formidable, monstrous adversaries that threaten their
realms, highlighting the theme of the hero's struggle against chaos and evil.
Furthermore, the legacies of these characters are deeply intertwined with their
extraordinary feats and the strength they exhibit, which ultimately shape the
destinies of their people and kingdoms. Each story serves as a foundational
myth within its respective culture, symbolizing a significant era marked by
heroic endeavors and the establishment of societal values, thus reinforcing the
importance of these figures in the collective memory and identity of their
cultures.
Symbols and Cultural Meanings in the Legend
of Sinhabahu
Cultural
symbols encompass a range of objects, words, and actions that embody the shared
meanings, values, and beliefs prevalent within a particular society, thereby
facilitating communication and reinforcing a sense of group identity. These
symbols can take various forms, including tangible items, specific behaviors,
and linguistic expressions, all of which offer a window into the collective
consciousness of a culture and act as vital tools for both individual
expression and communal solidarity. It is important to recognize that the
significance attributed to a symbol is not universal; rather, it is shaped by
cultural context and can differ markedly between societies or even evolve
within the same culture over time. This dynamic nature of symbols underscores
their role in reflecting and shaping the identities and experiences of
individuals within a cultural framework.
The
Legend of Sinhabahu is rich with symbolic elements that convey deeper meanings
and cultural values. One of the most prominent symbols is the lion, which
represents strength, courage, and nobility. The lion, or Sinha, serves as a
pivotal symbol, embodying the origins of the Sinhala ethnic group and
representing a powerful male archetype that resonates deeply with the identity
of the Sri Lankan people. In this context, Obeyesekere offers a deep
exploration of how symbols, cultural meanings, and individual concepts undergo
transformation, adaptation, and redefinition over time, significantly impacting
Sri Lankan society.
The Application of Psychoanalytic
Concepts to the Sinhabahu Myth
The application of psychoanalytic concepts to
the Sinhabahu myth is explored through the lens of ethnopsychoanalysis, which
interprets the narrative as a profound psychological drama that encapsulates
the archetypal conflicts inherent in the human psyche.
This approach delves into the myth's
characters and their interactions, revealing the underlying emotional and
psychological struggles that resonate with universal human experiences. By
examining the myth in this context, one can uncover the symbolic
representations of internal conflicts, such as the battle between primal
instincts and societal expectations, as well as the quest for identity and
belonging. The rich tapestry of the Sinhabahu story thus serves as a mirror
reflecting the complexities of human nature, illustrating how these timeless
themes continue to shape our understanding of self and society.
Sinhabahu's actions were significantly shaped
by a range of unconscious motivations that drove his behavior. These hidden,
instinctual forces acted as powerful motivators, often leading him to act
without full awareness of his decisions. The act of killing his father was not
merely a symbolic gesture; it was a tangible act of violence rooted in the
primal aggression that resides within the unconscious mind. This brutal act may
have left Sinhabahu with a lingering sense of guilt, stemming from the
deep-seated moral conflicts that arose from patricide. In an attempt to
reconcile his internal turmoil, he sought to establish a new kingdom and
initiate a fresh lineage, perhaps as a means of asserting his authority and
overcoming his feelings of guilt. However, his unresolved Oedipal conflicts
further complicated his psyche, ultimately leading him to engage in incestuous
relationships, reflecting the profound impact of his unconscious drives on his
actions and decisions.
Symbolic Transformation in the Sinhabahu Myth
Symbolic
transformation encompasses the dynamic processes through which symbols,
meanings, and cultural elements undergo change and development across various
contexts and over time. This phenomenon significantly impacts societal norms,
shapes personal identity, and influences our comprehension of the world around
us. It manifests in cultural evolution, where symbols adapt to reflect new
social realities and dynamics, as well as in individual psychological growth,
exemplified by Carl Jung's exploration of how symbols facilitate the
transformation of the individual psyche.
Additionally,
symbolic transformation is evident in the realms of art and design, where
creators skillfully manipulate existing images to forge new symbolic
interpretations and convey complex ideas. Furthermore, this concept extends
into more technical domains, such as the transformation of mathematical objects
within symbolic languages, illustrating the versatility and breadth of symbolic
transformation across diverse fields of human endeavor.
The
Sihabahu myth has had a profound impact on the collective identity and social
structures of the Sinhala nation, serving as a foundational narrative that has
shaped its cultural landscape. This myth not only redefined the beliefs and
practices of the Sinhala people but also acted as a catalyst for the evolution
of their societal norms and values. As the myth permeated various aspects of
life in Sri Lanka, it facilitated significant symbolic transformations that
influenced the formation of institutions and community practices. The
reverberations of the Sihabahu myth are evident in the way it has shaped the
identity of the Sinhala nation, fostering a sense of unity and belonging among
its people. Consequently, the myth has played a crucial role in the ongoing
development of Sri Lankan society, intertwining with its historical narrative
and contributing to the rich tapestry of cultural heritage that defines the
nation today.
Obeyesekere’s
insights are particularly illuminating when it comes to the evolution of the
Sinhabahu narrative. He adeptly analyzes how this story has transformed over
time, highlighting its significant cultural and anthropological ramifications.
By delving into the layers of meaning embedded within the tale, he reveals how
it reflects the values, beliefs, and social structures of the communities that have
embraced it. His examination not only underscores the narrative's relevance in
contemporary discourse but also emphasizes its role in shaping identity and
cultural heritage. Through this analysis, Obeyesekere contributes to a deeper
understanding of the interplay between folklore and societal dynamics,
showcasing the enduring power of storytelling in human experience.
Obeyesekere explores the intricate ways in which cultures create and utilize symbolic frameworks, such as myths and rituals, to address and reinterpret fundamental psychological challenges that are universally experienced. His analysis delves into the mechanisms through which these cultural constructs serve not only as coping strategies but also as means of understanding and giving meaning to the human experience. By examining various cultural contexts, Obeyesekere highlights how these symbolic systems reflect the collective psyche and provide individuals with a sense of identity and belonging. This investigation reveals the profound relationship between cultural expressions and psychological phenomena, illustrating how societies navigate existential questions and emotional struggles through the lens of their unique traditions and narratives.
Anthropological Interpretation of the Sinhabahu Myth
Anthropological
interpretation involves deciphering the complexities of cultures and human
behaviors by exploring the intricate "web of significance" or
"webs of meaning" that individuals construct and navigate, rather
than attempting to identify overarching universal principles. This approach
emphasizes the importance of context and the subjective experiences of people
within their cultural frameworks. In this light, Obesekara provides a
comprehensive analysis of the Sinhabahu myth, illustrating how this narrative
serves as a reflection of the values, beliefs, and social structures inherent
in the culture from which it originates. By examining the myth through an
anthropological lens, one can uncover the deeper meanings and implications it
holds for the community, revealing how such stories shape identity and
influence social dynamics.
The
Anthropological Interpretation of the Sinhabahu Myth delves into the cultural
and social significance of this narrative within the context of Sri Lankan
society. Sinhabahu becomes the progenitor of the Sinhalese people and serves as
a foundational legend that encapsulates themes of identity and power. From an anthropological perspective, the
myth can be seen as a reflection of the historical and social dynamics of the Sinhalese
community, illustrating their quest for legitimacy and unity in a diverse
cultural landscape. The lion, a symbol of strength and royalty, represents not
only the valor of the Sinhalese but also their aspirations for sovereignty and
cultural pride. By examining the myth through an anthropological lens, one can
gain insights into how such stories function as vehicles for cultural
transmission, reinforcing social norms and collective memory while also
addressing existential questions about lineage, belonging, and the human
condition.
Sinabahu - A Paradigmatic Myth
The
myth of Sinhabahu has emerged as a foundational narrative and a paradigmatic
myth within Sinhala culture, serving as a rich source of symbols and archetypes
that resonate deeply with the identity and values of the community.
A
paradigmatic myth serves as a crucial, archetypal narrative that lays the
groundwork for understanding the origins, identity, and values of a culture.
This foundational story acts as a narrative framework that not only shapes the
beliefs and social structures of a society but also influences its worldview.
By providing a culturally significant reference point, such myths are often
invoked to elucidate contemporary issues and to offer guidance for future
directions. A prime example of such a myth is the tale of Sinhabahu in Sri
Lanka, which plays a pivotal role in forging a national identity through a
shared origin narrative. This myth encapsulates the essence of the culture,
reinforcing communal bonds and collective values that resonate through
generations.
Cultures
are characterized by foundational myths that serve to create and uphold a
collective worldview, elucidate the origins and essence of the universe, and
define humanity's role within it. These narratives not only reinforce societal
norms and values but also offer essential guidance for navigating life's
complexities. By legitimizing various customs, rituals, and aspects of
identity, these myths provide a framework through which individuals can
understand their place in the world. They encapsulate the symbolic
interpretations of a community's shared reality, acting as a navigational tool
for successive generations as they confront the challenges of existence.
Through these stories, cultures transmit wisdom and insights that shape the
moral and ethical landscape of society, ensuring continuity and cohesion across
time.
The
tale of Sinhabahu serves as a quintessential example of an ideal myth,
encapsulating the cultural heritage, origins, and identity of a nation. Such
narratives are not unique to any single culture; rather, they resonate across
various societies worldwide, each offering a unique lens through which to view
human experience. These paradigmatic myths function as foundational stories
that help individuals comprehend the complexities of existence and human
behavior. For instance, the Greek myth of Sisyphus poignantly illustrates the
concept of futile labor, while the Old Testament's Exodus narrative stands as a
cornerstone for the identity of Israel. Similarly, the myth of Romulus and
Remus provides the legendary backdrop for the founding of Rome. Beyond these
examples, myths often encompass creation stories, heroic journeys, and
explanatory tales that seek to clarify the underlying reasons for existence and
the nature of the world. Through these rich narratives, societies articulate
their values, beliefs, and collective memories, thereby reinforcing their
cultural identity and continuity.
Conclusion
Gananath
Obeyesekere's "The Work of Culture: Symbolic Transformation in
Psychoanalysis and Anthropology" delves into the intricate ways in which
cultural symbolic systems in South Asia, with a particular focus on Sri Lanka,
serve to navigate and reshape psychological challenges. The book critically
examines the Oedipus complex through the lenses of Hindu and Buddhist
traditions, juxtaposing these interpretations with Freudian theories to
highlight their relevance within specific cultural practices. By investigating
the dynamic relationship between psychoanalysis and anthropology, Obeyesekere
seeks to illuminate the nuances of human symbolic expression and the deeper
meanings embedded in cultural contexts. This exploration not only enriches our
understanding of psychological dilemmas but also underscores the significance
of cultural frameworks in shaping individual and collective identities.
Obeyesekere
postulates that the Sinhabahu story is a Sri Lankan "Oedipus
narrative," and this myth functions as a cultural counterpart to the Greek
Oedipus story. By positioning the Sinhabahu myth alongside the Oedipus
narrative, Obeyesekere emphasizes the significance of local folklore in
understanding broader human experiences, illustrating how different cultures
articulate similar existential dilemmas through their unique storytelling
traditions.
Obeyesekere
highlights a notable aspect of the Sinhabahu myth: the absence of any
indication of remorse or ethical concerns regarding the act of parricide, which
is the killing of one's father. This lack of emotional conflict within the
narrative is particularly striking, as it raises questions about the moral
implications of such a grave act. In many cultural stories, parricide is often
accompanied by feelings of guilt or regret, serving as a reflection of the
societal values surrounding familial bonds and the sanctity of life. However,
in the case of Sinhabahu, the narrative seems to present the act as a
straightforward event, devoid of any moral scrutiny or emotional fallout. This
absence invites deeper analysis of the cultural context in which the myth was created,
suggesting a different set of values or beliefs regarding authority, power, and
familial relationships. The implications of this narrative choice are
significant, as they challenge conventional understandings of morality and the
human experience in relation to familial obligations.
He
explores the notion of "symbolic remove," a term he uses to describe
the intricate process through which symbolic forms, deeply embedded in cultural
frameworks, are both created and redefined through the lens of individual
cognition. This concept highlights the interplay between personal and cultural
symbols, illustrating how they collectively influence individual identity while
simultaneously contributing to broader societal meanings. Obeyesekere's
analysis offers a sophisticated perspective on the ways in which cultural
symbols evolve, emphasizing the dynamic relationship between individual
experiences and the collective cultural narrative.
References
Ahmed, S. (2012). Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory Oedipus complex: A
critical study with reference to D. H. Lawrence’s “Sons and Lovers. Internal
Journal of English and Literature Vol. 3(3), pp. 60-70.
Campbell, Joseph, 1968 & 2004. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Oxford:
Princeton University Press.
Fischer, M. J. and Dirsmith, M. W. (1995), "Strategy, technology, and
social processes within professional cultures: A negotiated order, ethnographic
perspective", Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 381-412.
Jutta von Buchholtz. (2000). Animals and the Psyche.Quarterly News.
Lewis, M. P. (2009). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Sixteenth edition.
Dallas, Texas.
Loewald, H.W. (2000). The Waning of the Oedipus Complex.J Psychother Pract Res.
9(4): 239–249.
Millar, K. (2011). The Power of Cultural Symbolism. Retrieved from http://www.societyandself.com/the-power-of-cultural-symbolism.html
Obeyesekere, G. (1990). The Work of Culture: Symbolic Transformation in Psychoanalysis
and Anthropology. University of Chicago Press.
Perelberg, R.J. (2009). Murdered father; dead father: revisiting the Oedipus
complex.Int J Psychoanal. 90(4):713-32.
Phelan. J.E. (2005). Consequences of the Unresolved Oedipal Paradigm: A Review
of the Literature. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 3-4.
Scott, A. (1990).The ethics of heroism in medieval and American Indian tales.
Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 3(3):37-58.
Stenudd, S. (2006). Psychoanalysis of Myth. Retrieved from http://www.stenudd.com/myth/freudjung/
Volkan, V.D. (1995.) Totem and Taboo in Romania: A Psychopolitical Diagnosis.
Mind and Human Interaction, 2: 66-83.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Appreciate your constructive and meaningful comments