Wednesday, April 16, 2025

ප්‍රභාකරන් සාධකය පිලිබඳ කථිකාවක් WANESA TV සමග

 



ප්‍රභාකරන් සාධකය පිලිබඳ කථිකාවක්  WANESA TV සමග 


ප්‍රභාකරන් තුල ව්‍යාථවේදී පෞරුෂ සාධක Pathological Personality traits දක්නට ලැබුණි. නමුත් මේ ගැන කතිකාවට බඳුන් වී ඇත්තේ ඉතාම අඩුවෙනි.2004 වසරේ ප්‍රභාකරන් දේශපාලනමය සහ යුදමය වශයෙන් ඉතා බලවත්ව සිටි අවදියේ දී ඔහුගේ පෞරුෂ සාධක හෙළි කරමින් කරමින් ප්‍රභාකරන් සාධකය පිලිබඳ මනෝවිද්‍යාත්මක විශ්ලේෂණයක් යන කෘතිය මම එළි දැක්වුයෙමි. එම ගවේෂණාත්මක කෘතිය මගින් ළමා ප්‍රභාකරන් චර්යාත්මක අක්‍රමතාවයකින් (Conduct Disorder) පෙළුණු බවත් පසුකාලීනව වැඩිහිටි දිවියේදී ඔහු තුල සමාජ විරෝධී පෞරුෂ ලක්ෂණ (Antisocial Personality Disorder) තිබෙන බවද ඔහුගේ ජිවිත කතාව සහ චර්යාව මගින් පෙන්වා දුනිමි. මේ මතය ඇතැම් වියතුන්ගේ විවේචනයට ද ලක් විය. නමුත් 2011 වසරේ මම යාපනය විශ්වවිද්‍යාලයේ මනෝවිද්‍යා අංශයේ මහාචාර්ය දයා සෝමසුන්දරම් මහතා අමතමින් 2004 වසරේ ප්‍රභාකරන් පිළිබඳව මගේ අධ්‍යනයන් ගැන තතු පැවසුවෙමි. වේලුපිල්ලේ ප්‍රභාකරන් සමාජ විරෝධී පෞරුෂ ලක්ෂණ වලින් යුතු පුද්ගලයෙකු බව මහාචාර්ය දයා සෝමසුන්දරම් ද පිලිගත්තේ ය. 

ප්‍රභාකරන් සාධකය පිලිබඳ කථිකාවක්  WANESA TV සමග  ( සවන් දෙන්න );

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4oacvpyec8

Saturday, April 12, 2025

Mind-Wandering in the Age of Overstimulation: The Mental Health Impact of Boredom

 



Dr. Ransirini de Silva & Dr. Ruwan M. Jayatunge

Boredom is an underexplored but significant emotional state with implications for mental health. In the modern digital age—where attention is continually stimulated and information is instantaneously accessible—the experience of boredom may be more frequent, and perhaps more distressing, than in previous generations.

Boredom is a transient affective state commonly perceived as dull or unpleasant. O’Hanlon (1981) described it as arising from monotonous tasks or limited external stimulation, while Barbalet (1999) conceptualized it as a discrete emotional experience. Typically regarded as negative (Danckert et al., 2018), boredom prompts individuals to seek novelty or escape the perceived stagnation, often resulting in mind-wandering and restlessness.

Universally, boredom is defined as the aversive state of wanting, but being unable, to engage in satisfying activity (Eastwood et al., 2012). Deng et al. (2022) associate boredom with self-dysregulation and attentional failure. It has also been linked to increased nostalgia (van Tilburg et al., 2012) and may reflect a lack of progress toward personally meaningful goals (van Hooft et al., 2018) or meaningful relationships, accompanied by diminished control over one’s life (Steele et al., 2013).

Despite its ubiquity, boredom remains understudied in the field of mental health (Bench & Lench, 2013). It is often identified as a symptom of diminished meaning or purpose (Binnema, 2004) and a precursor to impulsive behaviors (Dittmar & Drury, 2000). Associations have been found between boredom and substance misuse (Lee et al., 2006), problem gambling (Mercer et al., 2010), and reduced performance in academic and occupational settings (Li et al., 2024). Students experiencing boredom may underperform, while employees facing job boredom may suffer decreased productivity and deteriorating well-being.

Importantly, boredom has also been associated with serious psychological concerns. It is recognized as a risk factor for anxiety and depression (Olié et al., 2022) and contributes to poor psychological well-being more broadly (Weiss et al., 2022). It is closely intertwined with experiences of loneliness and social isolation (An et al., 2013) and may contribute to post-psychotic mood disturbances (Todman, 2003).

The COVID-19 pandemic further underscored the psychological impact of boredom. Prolonged social isolation and service disruptions heightened feelings of stagnation and meaninglessness. Tam et al. (2023) suggest that individuals who perceived boredom negatively experienced greater psychological vulnerability during this period.

Yet, boredom is not inherently detrimental. Emerging research reveals its adaptive potential when approached reflectively. Carroll et al. (2010) suggest that boredom can stimulate challenge-seeking, creativity, and prosocial behavior. Bench et al. (2012) argue that it encourages the pursuit of new, more fulfilling goals. When reframed as a signal for reorientation—rather than simply avoided—boredom can support resilience and psychological growth.

In summary, boredom is a complex, underappreciated emotional state with clear mental health consequences. It is associated with psychological distress, impulsivity, and diminished well-being, yet it may also motivate meaningful change and adaptive engagement. As digital environments reshape how we experience attention and engagement, understanding boredom becomes increasingly relevant. Future research and clinical practice must consider how to both mitigate its risks and cultivate its transformative potential—by encouraging rest, embracing boredom as a reflective state, and integrating boredom-tolerance into resilience-building programs.

Dr. Ransirini de Silva  PhD is a Senior Lecturer in Psychology and a Clinical Psychologist. She is the Head /Psychology & Counselling Department of Psychology & Counselling, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Open University of Sri Lanka.

Dr. Ruwan M. Jayatunge M.D. PhD  is a Medical Doctor and a Clinical Psychologist, also a member of the (APA) American Psychological Association. He is a guest lecturer at Sri Lankan and North American universities. 

  

References

An, J., Payne, L. L., Lee, M., & Janke, M. C. (2023). Understanding boredom and leisure in later life: A systematic review. Innovation in Aging, 7(8), igad109. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad109

Barbalet, J. M. (1999). Boredom and social meaning. The British Journal of Sociology, 50(4), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/000713199358572

Bench, S. W., & Lench, H. C. (2013). On the function of boredom. Behavioral Sciences, 3(3), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs3030459

Bench, S. W., & Lench, H. C. (2019). Boredom as a seeking state: Boredom prompts the pursuit of novel (even negative) experiences. Emotion, 19(2), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000433

Binnema, D. (2004). Interrelations of psychiatric patient experiences of boredom and mental health. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 25(8), 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840490506400

Carroll, B. J., Parker, P., & Inkson, K. (2010). Evasion of boredom: An unexpected spur to leadership? Human Relations, 63(7), 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349864

Danckert, J., & Merrifield, C. (2018). Boredom, sustained attention and the default mode network. Experimental Brain Research, 236(9), 2507–2518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4617-5

Deng, Y. Q., Shi, G., Zhang, B., Zheng, X., Liu, Y., Zhou, C., & Wang, X. (2022). The effect of mind wandering on cognitive flexibility is mediated by boredom. Acta Psychologica, 231, 103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103789

Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612456044

Dittmar, H., & Drury, J. (2000). Self-image – is it in the bag? A qualitative comparison between 'ordinary' and 'excessive' consumers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(2), 109–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00002-0

Lee, C. M., Neighbors, C., & Woods, B. A. (2007). Marijuana motives: Young adults’ reasons for using marijuana. Addictive Behaviors, 32(7), 1384–1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.09.010

Li, J., Kaltiainen, J., & Hakanen, J. J. (2024). Job boredom as an antecedent of four states of mental health: Life satisfaction, positive functioning, anxiety, and depression symptoms among young employees—A latent change score approach. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 907. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18430-z

Mercer, K. B., & Eastwood, J. D. (2010). Is boredom associated with problem gambling behaviour? It depends on what you mean by 'boredom'. International Gambling Studies, 10(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459791003754414

Ndetei, D. M., Nyamai, P., & Mutiso, V. (2023). Boredom—Understanding the emotion and its impact on our lives: An African perspective. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1213190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1213190

O’Hanlon, J. F. (1981). Boredom: Practical consequences and a theory. Acta Psychologica, 49, 53–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(81)90033-0

Olié, E., Dubois, J., Benramdane, M., Guillaume, S., & Courtet, P. (2022). Poor mental health is associated with loneliness and boredom during COVID-19-related restriction periods in patients with pre-existing depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 319, 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.040

Steele, R., Henderson, P., Lennon, F., & Swinden, D. (2013). Boredom among psychiatric in-patients: Does it matter? Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 19(4), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.112.010363

Tam, K. Y. Y., Chan, C. S., van Tilburg, W. A. P., Lavi, I., & Lau, J. Y. F. (2023). Boredom belief moderates the mental health impact of boredom among young people: Correlational and multi-wave longitudinal evidence gathered during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Personality, 91(3), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12764

Todman, M. (2003). Boredom and psychotic disorders: Cognitive and motivational issues. Psychiatry, 66(2), 146–167. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.66.2.146.20623

van Hooft, E. A. J., & van Hooff, M. L. M. (2018). The state of boredom: Frustrating or depressing? Motivation and Emotion, 42(6), 931–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9710-6

van Tilburg, W. A., Igou, E. R., & Sedikides, C. (2013). In search of meaningfulness: Nostalgia as an antidote to boredom. Emotion, 13(3), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030442

Weiss, E. R., Todman, M., Maple, E., & Bunn, R. R. (2022). Boredom in a time of uncertainty: State and trait boredom associations with psychological health during COVID-19. Behavioral Sciences, 12(8), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12080298

 

 

 

 

Thursday, April 10, 2025

Suicidal Behavior Disorder

  



Dr. Neil Fernando & Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge

Suicide is a psychiatric emergency and needs immediate intervention. It has been recognized as a major health problem and a leading cause of death worldwide. Suicide does not occur in a vacuum; it’s a fatal outcry and a highly complex and multifaceted phenomenon.

Suicide is the most severe and final manifestation of psychological pain (Rahman et al., 2010). Suicide is a social malady with far-reaching impact. Suicide is defined as an act of intentionally terminating one’s own life (Nock et al., 2008). The National Institute of Mental Health defines suicide as a death caused by self-directed injurious behavior with intent to die as a result of the behavior. Suicides result from the complex interaction of many factors (O’Connor et al., 2014).

Suicidal behavior has a unique trajectory and the behavior pattern is clearly in the medical domain. Suicidal behavior encompasses a spectrum of behavior from suicide attempt and preparatory behaviors to completed suicide. Suicide behavior disorder (SBD) was introduced in DSM-5 as a disorder for further consideration and potential acceptance into the diagnostic system. Many mental health clinicians recognize suicidal behavior as an independent construct.

According to the French sociologist Emile Durkheim, the term suicide is applied to all cases of death resulting directly or indirectly from a positive or negative act of the victim himself, which he knows will produce this result. For Emile Durkheim suicide is not a personal act. He believed that the more socially integrated and connected a person is, the less likely he or she is to commit suicide. Durkheim identifies four different types of suicide which are egoistic suicide, altruistic suicide, anomic suicide and fatalistic suicide.

Psychodynamics of the pathway to suicide is complex. According to Menninger (1938) suicide is caused by unconscious drives. Depression, psychic pain, impulsiveness, anger, anxiety, despair, loneliness, panic, violence, revenge, and a host of other factors are acting in a complex and almost infinite combination to produce the catastrophic behavior and it leads to suicide (Gibbons, 2024).  Some experts propose the relationship between attachment styles and suicide ideation. Silva Filho and team (2023) highlight that disruptive attachments are related to emotional dysregulation and mental disorders throughout life.  

Suicide and suicidal behavior have become a public health concern in Sri Lanka. The suicide rate in Sri Lanka in 2022 was 27 per 100 000 and 5 per 100 000, in males and females, respectively, with an overall suicide rate of 15 per 100 000 populations. However, incidence of suicide is underreported in Sri Lanka due to legal and stigma-associated factors. According to the World Health Organization-based statistics, suicide occurs in approximately 16.7 per 100,000 persons per year and is the 14th-leading cause of death worldwide.

For the development of suicide risk, biological, psychological, social, and environmental factors have been identified (Turecki, et al., 2019). The link between suicide and mental disorders is well established. There is a correlation between suicidality and psychopathology (Gvion &Apter, 2011). Psychopathology, biological vulnerability, family characteristics, and stressful life events play a key role in suicidal behaviors.  The most common psychiatric conditions associated with suicide or serious suicide attempts are mood disorders, but personality disorders, alcohol and substance abuse, anxiety disorders, and schizophrenia are also frequently associated with suicidal behavior. (Sher,2004). Other risk factors such as unemployment, marital disruptions and financial crises also play a crucial role.

Suicides have a rippling effect. As described by Pirkis and Nordentoft (2011), media reporting of suicide can influence suicide rates. According to the social learning theory one person's suicide can influence another's suicidal behavior. The aftermath of suicide touches the lives of family and friends of the victim. The ripple effect can impact individuals and their families and friends. The ripple effect can extend to something known as "vicarious suicidality”. The evidence suggests that suicidal behavior is “contagious” (Gould & Lake 2013).

Suicide is preventable and preventing requires strategies at all levels of society with a comprehensive public health approach. Promoting mental health education and de-stigmatisation efforts are highly essential. Suicide prevention is an emotive, complex goal for clinicians and health systems (Larkin et al., 2023).

Clinical suicidology” emphasizing suicide risk assessment, treatment, training, and the management of suicide-related liability. For there to be suicidal behavior there needs to be an established intent to die and a measurable medical lethality associated with the behavior (Silverman,2006). Clinical suicidology identifies suicide an act with a fatal outcome which the deceased, knowing or expecting a potentially fatal outcome, has initiated and carried out with the purpose of bringing about wanted changes (DeLeo et al., 2004).

Psychotherapeutic, pharmacological, or neuromodulatory treatments of mental disorders can often prevent suicidal behavior (Turecki et al., 2016). antidepressants are widely used in suicide prevention pharmacotherapy. For psychotherapeutic methods mental health clinicians recommend dialectical behavior therapy, cognitive therapy prolonged grief therapy and attachment based family therapy.

Implementing effective public health programs, promote wellness and removing stigma around suicide related behaviors can reduce the risk of suicide contagion. Furthermore, identifying risk factors and recognizing the warning signs for suicide can help prevent suicide. Media reporting on suicide can affect suicidal behavior and responsible reporting help prevent the suicide contagion effect. There should be a comprehensive national strategy to prevent suicide.


(Dr. Neil Fernando is a consultant Psychiatrist and   Dr. Ruwan M Jayatunge is a Clinical Psychologist)


References

 

De Leo, D., & Spathonis, K. (2004). Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour in Late Life.  Suicidal Behaviour: Theories and Research Findings.

Gibbons, R. (2024). Understanding the psychodynamics of the pathway to suicide. International Review of Psychiatry, 36(4-5), 508–516.

Gould, M., & Lake, A. M. (2013). The contagion of suicide behavior: Impact of media reporting on suicide. Forum on Global Violence Prevention: Based on Global Health Institute of Medicine, National Research Council: Washington DC: ational Academics Press.

Gvion Y, Apter A. Aggression, impulsivity and suicide behavior: a review of the literature. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2011;15:93-112.

Larkin C, Arensman E, Boudreaux ED. Preventing Suicide in Health Systems: How Can Implementation Science Help? Arch Suicide Res. 2023 Oct-Dec;27(4):1147-1162. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2022.2131490. Epub 2022 Oct 20. PMID: 36267036

Nock MK, Borges G, Bromet EJ, Alonso J, Angermeyer M, Beautrais A, et al. Cross-national prevalence and risk factors for suicidal ideation, plans and attempts. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192:98-105.

O'Connor RC, Nock MK. The psychology of suicidal behaviour. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;1(1):73-85. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70222-6. Epub 2014 Jun 4. PMID: 26360404.

Pirkis J, Nordentoft M. Media influences on suicide and attempted suicide. In: O’Connor RC, Platt S, Gordon J, editors. International handbook of suicide prevention: research, policy and practice. Chichester; Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. pp. 531–44.

 Rahman B.,   Shirin V ., Mitra. N (2010). The relationship between attachment styles and suicide ideation: the study of Turkmen students, Iran, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 5,   Pages 1190-1194, ISSN 1877-0428,

Sher,L.(2004). Preventing suicide, QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 97, Issue 10  Pages 677–680, https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hch106

Silva Filho OCD, Avanci JQ, Pires TO, de Vasconcellos Carvalhaes Oliveira R, Assis SG. Attachment, suicidal behavior, and self-harm in childhood and adolescence: a study of a cohort of Brazilian schoolchildren. BMC Pediatr. 2023 Aug 17;23(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04215-7. PMID: 37592202; PMCID: PMC10433545.

Silverman. M.M.  (2006). The Language of Suicidology.Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2006 Oct;36(5):519-32.

Turecki, G., Brent, D.A., Gunnell, D. et al. Suicide and suicide risk. Nat Rev Dis Primers 5, 74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0121-0

Turecki G, Brent DA. Suicide and suicidal behaviour. Lancet. 2016 Mar 19;387(10024):1227-39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00234-2. Epub 2015 Sep 15. PMID: 26385066; PMCID: PMC5319859.

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

සෙක්ස් සහ දේශපාලනය

 




ලංකාවේ SEX වලින් තොරව දේශපාලනය කතා කිරීම අපහසුය. සෙක්ස් යනු පුද්ගලික දෙයක් වූවද එය දේශපාලනය සබග බැඳී පවතියි. හිට්ලර් closet homosexual කෙනෙකු වූ අතර එය අවිඥාණිකව ඔහු ගේ භූ දේශපානයට බලපෑවේය​.   ජෝන් එෆ් කෙනඩි sex addict වූ අතර ඔහුගේ දේශපානය විශ්ලේශනය කරන විට ඔහුගේ ලිංගිකත්වය ඔහුගේ දේශපාලනයට බල පැවැත්වූ ආකාරය හෙලි වෙයි. ලංකාව ගතහොත් බණ්ඩාරනායක bi sexual පුද්ගලයෙකු බව පෙනේ. ඔහු ගේ සමරිසි ආශයන් ඔහුගේ දේශපාලනය කෙරෙහි බලපෑවේය​. කොතලාවල , ජේ ආර් යන දේශපාලකයන්ට multiple partners සිටියෝය​. ඔවුන් ගේ දේශපාලනයේ සෙ‍ක්ස් පැතිකඩයේ සේයා සොයා ගැනීම අසීරු නැත​.ප්‍රේමදාසට ejaculate වන විට ඔහු අමු තිත්ත කුනුහරප කියන බව රන්ජන් හඞ පට වලින් කියවුනේය​. මම ඒ පිලිබඳව විමතියට පත් නොවෙමි. ප්‍රේමදාස පිලිබඳ මනෝ විශ්ලේශනයේදී ඔහුගේ ලූම්පන් දේශපාලන දිවියේ  Catharsis එක මේ කුනුහරප කීම තුල අඩංගුය.​චන්දිරිකා ගේ boy friends  ලා ඇයගේ දේශපාලන දිවියට කල බලපෑම නොරහසකි. වර්තමාන දේශපාලන සන්දර්භය උඩද සෙක්ස් සහ දේශපාලනය අත් වැල් බැඳ පවතියි.






Find Us On Facebook