Dr. Ruwan M Jayatunge
Self-awareness is one's capacity for
self-directed knowledge, and self-awareness is the mind becoming its own object. However, in contemporary
neuroscience and traditional philosophy, the concept of the "I" is
often regarded as an illusion or mirage, as it lacks a stable, physical
foundation and serves primarily as a mental construct. Neuroscience
increasingly describes the "self" not as a physical entity, but as a
dynamic informational entity. The brain acts as a "prediction
machine," constantly generating a "self-model" to anticipate
internal bodily needs (interoception) and external social threats.
Neuroscientific
research suggests that the self emerges from complex brain processes rather
than existing as a singular, cohesive entity. Instead, the self can be
understood as an ongoing narrative that the brain constructs to weave together
diverse sensory, emotional, and cognitive inputs into a unified experience.
Thus, the sense of self is a mental fabrication, an effective organizational
mechanism, but not a standalone, enduring reality.
Self-awareness
in Children
Jean
Piaget's theory of cognitive development posits that a child's self-concept is
shaped through active interaction with their environment, advancing through
four universal stages from infancy to adolescence. This framework is
fundamental for understanding the formation of the self, as Piaget argued that
self-concept is not innate but rather a cognitive structure that develops
progressively through these distinct stages.
From
the moment of birth, infants possess the ability to distinguish between touches
they initiate themselves and those that come from external sources. For
instance, newborns tend to turn their heads more towards an external stimulus,
such as a gentle touch on the cheek, rather than their own hand making contact
with their face. This marks the initial awareness of their separateness from
caregivers. By the age of 5 to 6 months, infants begin to recognize themselves
as distinct individuals, realizing that their actions can influence their
environment, such as kicking a mobile to make it move. By 18 months, many
infants successfully pass the "Mirror Test," demonstrating an
understanding that the reflection they see is themselves and not another child.
How the Brain Constructs a Sense of Self?
Contemporary
research indicates that the sense of "I" arises from intricate neural
networks and brain activity. This sense of self is not a singular occurrence
but rather a dynamic, layered process that unfolds continuously. The brain
constructs identity by merging physical sensations with psychological
experiences, creating a cohesive narrative. Functional MRI studies reveal that
the brain regions associated with the self and close relationships often
overlap, implying that our understanding of "I" is intrinsically
linked to our connections with others.
The Hippocampus and Its Role in
Self-Identity
The
hippocampus is vital for self-identity. The hippocampus plays a crucial
role in shaping self-identity by integrating elements of space, time, and
memory to create a coherent personal narrative. It serves as the primary center
for developing an individual's life story, going beyond mere fact storage to
construct a stable and unified account of one's experiences. The functionality
of the hippocampus is often centred on enhancing the capacity to formulate
meaningful and effective personal narratives.
The insula's role
The
insula is the brain's primary receiver for interoception—the sense of the
internal state of the body. It monitors heart rate, lung expansion, and gut
signals. By constantly tracking these "life signals," the insula
provides the most basic level of selfhood: the feeling of being a living,
breathing organism. The insula is involved in a wide variety of functions,
ranging from sensory and affective processing to high-level cognition, such as
processes constituting the self.
The Role of the Anterior Precuneus (aPCu)
The
anterior precuneus (aPCu) forms the physical and spatial sense of self. The
anterior precuneus (aPCu) is situated in the medial parietal lobe, nestled
between the two hemispheres of the brain. This region is recognized as the
central hub for the physical sense of self, often referred to as the
"I." It plays a crucial role in a neural network, integrating sensory
data to create a cohesive mental representation of the body's position and
movement in space. By processing information related to location, motion, and
the positioning of muscles and joints, the aPCu helps maintain a
three-dimensional understanding of the body. It serves as a physical anchor for
consciousness, and when its activity is disrupted, individuals may experience
self-dissociation, leading to sensations of floating, falling, or a
disconnection from their own identity. The aPCu is particularly well-defined in
non-human primates, including macaque monkeys and chimpanzees.
The Experience of Self and Time
Neuroscience
postulates that the concepts of self and time are intertwined rather than
separate entities, functioning as two facets of a singular mental construct.
The brain integrates these elements to form a cohesive "theater of
experience." Humans possess a distinctive capability known as
"autonoetic consciousness," which allows them to mentally navigate
both memories and future possibilities. Central to this process is the sense of
"I," which acts as the focal point within this dynamic framework. As
this framework shifts, the brain continuously refines the self-model, fostering
the perception of a stable "I" that traverses an ever-changing
landscape of time.
Buddha's Teaching of Anattā (non-self)
The Buddha, a
prominent early advocate of the no-self doctrine, articulated the concept of
Anatta, which posits that the notion of "I" is merely an illusion
created by the interplay of five aggregates: physical form, sensations,
perceptions, mental formations, and consciousness. This illusion resembles a
mirage, appearing substantial from afar but revealing its fragmented nature
upon closer examination. Central to this teaching is the idea of Sakkāya Diṭṭhi,
or the belief in a permanent self, which the Buddha refuted by asserting that
there is no enduring essence within us. Instead, what we perceive as the self
is a transient amalgamation of ever-changing physical and mental elements,
shaped by various causes and conditions.
Milinda
Nagasena Debate- The Chariot Metaphor
The
dialogue between King Milinda, known as Menander I of Greece, and the monk
Nāgasena took place in the 2nd century BCE. In this philosophical exchange,
Nāgasena employs the metaphor of a chariot to illustrate the concept of the
self as an illusion. He argues that the term "chariot" does not
denote a singular, hidden essence within its components; rather, it is a
designation we apply when the parts—such as wheels, axle, and pole—are
assembled in a particular manner. By equating the human self to the chariot,
Nāgasena demonstrates that the self can operate effectively without being a
fixed, enduring entity.
David Hume's Bundle
Theory
David Hume, an 18th-century Scottish philosopher, argued
that when he looked inward, he could never catch a glimpse of a permanent self,
only a "bundle or collection of different perceptions" in constant
flux. Hume argued that
the concept of a permanent, unified "self" is a fiction of the mind.
He noted that there is no "constant and invariable" impression that
lasts an entire lifetime to serve as a base for the self. Hume theorized that
introspection reveals no enduring self but rather a transient collection of
perceptions. He maintained that when one seeks to identify a core identity,
what emerges is not a singular, stable essence but a dynamic array of
experiences—ranging from sensations of heat and cold to emotions like love and
hatred. This led Hume to conclude that the notion of a fixed "I" is
merely a construct of the mind, designed to unify these ever-changing
experiences.
Thomas Metzinger's "Ego Tunnel" Theory
Thomas
Metzinger's "Ego Tunnel" theory highlights that the brain constructs
a highly convincing self-model, leading us to perceive it as reality. He
suggests that while we may feel like individuals, we are essentially
"being no one," experiencing a vivid simulation of identity.
According to Metzinger, the concept of "I" is not a fixed entity but
rather a dynamic, transparent model created by our brain. This theory
emphasizes that our perception of reality is not direct; instead, the brain
generates a simplified, real-time simulation or "tunnel" of the world
around us.
"I" is a Biological Defense Mechanism
Compelling
evidence for the concept of non-self emerges from neurostimulation research.
The notion of the self as an illusion or mirage is prevalent in both
neuroscience and philosophy, suggesting that the self is not a tangible entity
but rather a mental construct. The brain generates a self-model, creating a
seamless simulation of individuality that often goes unnoticed. Consequently,
the "I" becomes a narrative fabrication, serving as a biological
defense mechanism rather than a concrete reality.
References
Chavoix C, Insausti R. Self-awareness and the medial temporal
lobe in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Jul;78:1-12.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 Apr 19. PMID: 28433653.
Elder, C., et al. (2023). "A Fluid
Self-Concept: How the Brain Maintains Coherence and Positivity." The Journal of Neuroscience. (Describes how the brain actively updates and protects the self-concept).
Lei Y. Sociality and self-awareness in animals. Front
Psychol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1065638. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1065638. PMID:
36710826; PMCID: PMC9881685.
Lyu, D., et al. (2023). "Causal evidence for the processing of bodily self in the anterior precuneus."Neuron. (Identifies the aPCu as the physical hub for the sense of
"I").
Mograbi, D. C., et al. (2023). "The cognitive neuroscience of self-awareness: Current status and future directions." WIREs Cognitive Science. (Summarizes the self as a
multi-layered model of various processes).
Paquola, C., et
al. (2025). "The architecture of the human default mode network explored
with histology and MRI." Nature Neuroscience. (Provides evidence of the
DMN as an insulated core for internal reflection).
Tisserand A, Philippi N, Botzung A, Blanc F. Me, Myself and
My Insula: An Oasis in the Forefront of Self-Consciousness. Biology (Basel).
2023 Apr 14;12(4):599. doi: 10.3390/biology12040599. PMID: 37106799; PMCID:
PMC10135849.
Wittmann M. Modulations of the experience of self and time.
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec 15;38:172-81. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.008. Epub
2015 Jun 26. PMID: 26121958.
