Wednesday, November 25, 2020

යේසුස් බුද්ධ ශ්‍රාවකයෙකු වීද ?



 

යේසුස් බුද්ධ ශ්‍රාවකයෙක් බව කියමින් මා මිත්‍ර නාරද කරුණාතිලක පොතක් ලිව්වා. නමුත් මා සිතන පරිදි යේසුස් ක්‍රිස්තුස් බෞද්ධ පංචසීලයවත් දැනගෙන හිටියේ නෑ.. යේසුස් වයින් පානය කලා. මේ වයින් ඇල්කොහොල් රහිත වයින් ලෙස සිතමු. නමුත් ඔහු ගලීල මුහුගේ මසුන් මැරුවා. යේසුස් ක්‍රිස්තුස් ගේ ජීවිත කතාව අනුව ඔහු කුරසයෙන් උට්ඨානයට පත්වී පසුවද ගලීලයට පැමින ඔහුගේ ශ්‍රාවකයන්ට උපදෙස් දෙනවා මසුන් අහිනක් දැල් දමා අල්ලා ගැනීමට.  

ජේසුස් ජීවත් වූ කාලයේම රෝම යුද නිලධාරීන් කිතුනු ආගම වැළඳ ගත්තා. බොහෝ විට ඔවුන් රහසින් එය කරන්න ඇති. මෑතකදී  පලස්තීනයේ (වර්තමාන ඊශ්‍රායලය​) රෝම නිලධාරීන් සිටි ගොඩනැගිල්ලක පැරණි ක්‍රිස්තියානි රහස් සංකේතය මත්සයා (පීටර් - ද ෆිෂිමන්) හමු වුනා. රෝම ගවනර් වූ පයිලට් ගේ බිරිඳත් රහසින් කිතුනු ආගම වැළඳ ගත් අයෙක්. මේ අනුව පෙනී යන්නේ ජේසුස් යුදෙව් පූජකයන්ට මෙන්ම රෝම අධිරාජ්‍යටත් තර්ජනයක් ලෙස සැලකූ  පුද්ගලයෙක්. නීට්ශේ පැවසූ පරිදි ජේසුස් රෝම සපත්තුවට යටවී සිටි රෝම පාලනයට එදිරිව සටන් කල නොහැකි බෙලහීන යුදෙව්වන්ට සැනසිලිදායක දහමක් එනම් ක්‍රිස්තියානිය දේශනා කලා.  ඔබලා මේ ආත්මයේ දුක් වින්දත් ලබන ආත්මයේ ස්වර්ග සැප විඳිනවා යන්න එහි අන්තර්ගත පණිවිඩය ලඝු කරන්න පුලුවන්. මේ නිසයි ක්‍රිස්තියානිය වහලුන් ගේ දහමක් බව නීට්ශේ කිව්වේ. තමන් රජෙකු බව ජේසු කිව්වා. ඒ රජකම තිබෙන්නේ මේ පොලෝතළයේ නොව ස්වර්ගයේ. නමුත් රෝම අධ්‍යරාජවාදීන් මේ "රජු " කතාවට බිය වුනා. 

ජේසු ව්‍යාපාරය ආරම්භ වන්නේ ඔහුගේ ශාරීරික මරණයෙන් පසුව . එය ව්‍යාපාර දෙකකට බෙදුනා. එක් ව්‍ය්‍යාපාරයක් ආරම්භ කලේ යේසුස් ගේ සොහොයුරෙකු වන ජේම්ස්. පසුව රෝම පාළනය විසින් ජේමිස් ව ගල් ගසා මරා දැමුවා. දෙවන ව්‍යාපාරය ආරම්භ කලේ සෝල් (පෝල්) ඔහු මුල් කාලයේ ජේසු විරෝධියෙක්. පසුව ජේසු ව්‍යාපාරය ඔහු අතට ගන්නවා. ඔහු තමයි යේසුස් ගේ ජීවිත කතාව ලියන්නේ. ජේම්ස් විසින් ලියූ සත්‍ය ජීවිත කතාව පෝල් විසින් යටපත් කරනවා. 

ජේම්ස් විසින් ලියූ ලේඛන වලට අනුව කුරුස ගසේදී යේසුස් මිය යන්නේ නෑ. ඔහුව ඇරමිතියාවේ ජෝසෆ් විසින් ප්‍රතිකාර කොට හොර රහසේ ඉන්දියාවට පිටත් කරනවා. ඉන් දියාවේදී  ඔහු බුදු දහම හදාරනවා. යේසුස් ගේ සොහොන ලෙස සලකන සොහොනක් කාශ්මිරයේ තිබෙනවා. 

මේ අනුව පසුකාලීනව යේසුස් බුද්ධ ශ්‍රාවකයෙක් වූවාද​? 

Wednesday, November 11, 2020

මෝගන් ෆ්‍රීමන් යන නළුවා උපන්නේ යාපනේද ?

මෝගන් ෆ්‍රීමන් යන නළුවා යාපනයේ වෙල්වෙටිතුරේ උපත ලැබුවෙකු බවත් ඔහුගේ ඇත්ත නම මුරුගන් පිරිමාහන් බවත් කියවෙනවා.

  

Sunday, November 8, 2020

The Comfortable Lie

 

 

Holocaust never happened  
Hitler had never been born 
NAZIs were good Samaritans
Auschwitz  was a  theme park
Nuremberg was a festival
This is the lie we gonna tell     
To our next generation 

Sunday, October 25, 2020

Consequences of Cannabis Use



Studies show significant negative effects of smoking marijuana on physical and mental health as well as social and occupational functioning (Gazdek, 2014). Smoking marijuana is known to have hemodynamic consequences (Mittleman et al., 2001). Cannabis also has immunosuppressant and endocrine effects although the clinical significance of these is still not clear (Ashton, 2001). Cannabis smoking shows a dose-response relation with pulmonary risk in the same way that tobacco smoking does. Although problems of cannabis use can arise at any level of use, however low, cannabis use disorders and other problems are more likely to arise in long term, heavy daily users than in casual, infrequent users. (Winstock, et al., 2010).   Longitudinal association between cannabis use and mental health has been studied by the researchers. Cannabis use is a known risk factor for a range of mental health problems (van Gastel et al., 2014). Cannabis use has been associated with several adverse life outcomes including unemployment, legal problems, dependence and early school leaving (Serafini et al., 2013). Furthermore, Monshouwer and colleagues (2006) specify that cannabis use is associated with aggression and delinquency. In addition Fergusson and Boden (2008) point out that greater welfare dependence and lower relationship and life satisfaction associated with cannabis abuse.  Majority of studies have suggested a significant cognitive decline in cannabis abusers compared to non-abusers and healthy controls (Shrivastava et al., 2011; Solowij, 1988). According to Kalant (2004) Cannabis use has been linked to a number of both short- and long-term health consequences, including depression, paranoia, learning problems, memory and attention deficits. In addition Cannabis use also causes symptoms of depersonalization, fear of dying and irrational panic ideas (Khan & Akella 2009). Also cannabis use significantly increase the risk for manic symptoms (Henquet, Krabbendam & Graaf, 2006) and mania (Leweke & Koethe, 2008). Evidence indicates that cannabis use is considerably associated with both attempted and completed suicides among healthy youths (Serafini et al., 2013; Price et al., 2009).  Cannabis intoxication can occur shortly after cannabis use. The intoxication by cannabis is associated with subjective symptoms of euphoria, perceptual distortion, continuous giggling, sedation, lethargy, impaired perception of time, difficulties in the performance of complex mental processes, impaired judgment and social withdrawal (Crippa et al. 2012). Some clinicians have noticed panic attacks with cannabis intoxication. Cannabis intoxication symptoms are usually gone after a maximum of one week abstinence (Lishman, 1988).  Heavy cannabis use could lead to an ‘amotivational syndrome which has been described as personality deterioration with loss of energy and drive to work (Tennant & Groesbeck, 1972; Johns, 2001). Cannabis-induced amotivational syndrome negatively impacts on volition, self care and social performance.  Cannabis-induced psychotic disorder (CIPD) refers to psychotic symptoms that arise in the context of cannabis intoxication (Morales-Muñoz et al., 2014). Cannabis use is a risk factor for the development of incident psychotic symptoms (Arendt et al, 2005; Kuepper et al., 2011) and exacerbates psychosis (Hall et al., 2004).  Hall and team (2004) state that cannabis use can precipitate schizophrenia in vulnerable individuals. Deficits in prepulse inhibition (PPI) and cannabis abuse are consistently found in schizophrenia (Morales-Muñoz et al., 2015).  Cannabis use in adolescence leads to a two to three fold increase in relative risk for schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder in adulthood (Arseneault et al., 2004). The abuse of cannabis by patients with psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and mood and anxious disorders has a negative impact both in the acute and advanced stages of these conditions (Diehl, Cordeiro &, Laranjeira, 2010).  Exposure to marijuana during a critical period of neural development may interrupt maturational processes (Jacobus et al., 2009). Adolescents appear more adversely affected by heavy use than adults (Schweinsburg, Brown & Tapert , 2008).  Chronic cannabis use may alter brain structure and function in adult and adolescent population (Batalla et al., 2013). Sami and colleagues (2015) suspect cannabis use may be associated with   dopamine signaling alterations. Fontes and team (2011) point out that cannabis use has been associated with prefrontal cortex (PFC) dysfunction.  Arseneault and colleagues (2004) were of the view that cases of psychotic disorder could be prevented by discouraging cannabis use among vulnerable youths. Consequently Moore and team (2007) emphasize that sufficient evidence to warn young people that using cannabis could increase their risk of developing a psychotic illness later in life.  According to El Marroun and team (2009) maternal cannabis use, even for a short period, may be associated with several adverse fetal growth trajectories. Cannabinoids have the ability to cross the placental barrier to the foetus and are detectable in the breast milk of mothers who use cannabis (Liebke, 2001). Current evidence indicates that cannabis use both during pregnancy and lactation, may adversely affect neurodevelopment, especially during periods of critical brain growth both in the developing fetal brain and during adolescent maturation, with impacts on neuropsychiatric, behavioural and executive functioning. (Jaques et al., 2014). Prenatal marijuana exposure is associated with adverse perinatal effects (Astley & Little, 1990). 

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

Cognitive Processing Therapy


Ruwan M Jayatunge M.D.

Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) has been recognised as one of the effective methods that can be used to treat PTSD. The Cognitive processing therapy was developed by Dr Patricia Resick - a renowned Psychologist in 1988 and she did a lot of single cases until the first publication on it in 1992. Many studies have shown the efficacy of Cognitive processing therapy. Dr Resick defines (CPT) as a manualized therapy that includes common elements from general cognitive-behavioral treatments. Its developed with both cognitive therapy and written trauma accounts.CPT is an evidence-based approach  to combat psychological trauma. CPT is recommended for clients with:, PTSD and comorbid diagnoses such as depression and substance abuse. Its generally not recommended for clients with active suicidal behavior, current Psychosis, or the victims with severe dissociation with loss of memory of the traumatic event.

This therapeutic mode is primarily based on Social Cognitive Theory. When a traumatic event occurs it can dramatically alter basic beliefs about the world, the self and others. In addition 5 major dimensions that may be disrupted by traumatic events:, safety, trust, power and control, esteem and intimacy. The CPT focuses on how trauma survivors integrate traumatic events into their overall belief system through assimilation or accomodation. The CPT goals are to process natural emotions (other than fear) in clients with PTSD, address the content of the meaning derived from the traumatic memory., accommodation - accepting that the traumatic event occurred and discovering ways to successfully integrate the experience into the one’s life.

Resick et al. (2002) indicate that the therapy focuses initially on assimilated–, distorted beliefs such as denial and self-blame. Then the, focus shifts to overgeneralized beliefs about oneself and the world. Beliefs and assumptions held before the trauma are also considered. Clients are taught to challenge their beliefs and assumptions, through Socratic questioning and the use of daily worksheets. Once dysfunctional beliefs are deconstructed, more balanced self statements, are generated and practiced. The exposure component consists of having clients write detailed accounts of the most traumatic incident(s) that they read to themselves and to the therapists. Clients are encouraged to experience their emotions while writing and reading, and the accounts are then used to determine "stuck points": areas of conflicting beliefs, leaps of, logic, or blind assumptions.

Dr Resick hypothesizes that when individuals are confronted with new information that is inconsistent with preexisting schemas (i.e., stored bodies of knowledge), one of two processes occurs: assimilation or accommodation. Accommodation is the modification of existing schemas to incorporate new events and information. In trauma survivors, these processes often involve the themes of agency, safety, trust, power, esteem, and intimacy. Sobel et al.(2009) sugget that accommodation is necessary to integrate a new event, traumatized individuals sometimes over-accommodate trauma-relevant information. They noted that over-accommodation occurs when schema changes are inaccurate and over-generalized.

CPT is a highly structured protocol in, which the client learns the skill of recognizing and challenging, dysfunctional cognitions, first about the worst traumatic event and, then later with regard to the meaning of the events for current, beliefs about self and others.

 

Find Us On Facebook